Laserfiche WebLink
SOLID WASTE FUND <br /> OVERTIME PROJECTION <br /> I, 500,000 <br /> i <br /> i <br /> 450,000 <br /> 400,000 <br /> 350,000 j <br /> 300,000 <br /> 250,000 <br /> 200,000 rr., <br /> i <br /> 150 000 ~ <br /> 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 <br /> Upon examination of 83 Departments/Divisions (See Exhibit B for List of departments), Solid Waste Landfills and <br /> Puuanahulu ranked in the top five in FYE 2003 for percentage of overtime to total salaries and wages. In FYE 2002, <br /> Landfills ranked 13th and Puuanahulu ranked sixth. The increase in overtime from FYE 2002 to FYE 2003 of <br /> $97,135 ranked Landfills second behind Fire Protection. <br /> <br /> Transfers from S&W and Fringes, and excessive/underbudgeted OT may indicate a problem w/vacancies. Transfer <br /> from S&W was made at the beginning ofthe year which may indicate that excessive OT is not due to vacancies. <br /> If OT continues to grow, more emphasis should be placed on filling vacancies or reclassifying positions. <br /> 1. A review of OT may answer questions such as: <br /> Y Was increase in overtime unavoidable and mostly due to: <br /> Emergencies? <br /> Specialized work? <br /> Vacancies <br /> ? Number of employees receiving OT? <br /> ? Average OT amount? <br /> ? Are we at a level where a greater effort should be made to fill vacancies or use independent <br /> contractors? <br /> Page 6 <br /> <br />