Laserfiche WebLink
SOLID WASTE FUND <br /> 5604.02-341 Miscellaneous Charees <br /> 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 <br /> DESCRIP'170N ACTUAL A(TU.AL BIIDGI:E ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET <br /> 341 MISC. CHARGES 10,004 130452 150,796 140,526 210,780" 410,513 <br /> A. DOH, DOS}{ 5,000 5,000 5,000 <br /> B. EPARTMENTAL ADMIN FEES 145,796 205,780 405,513 <br /> C. <br /> D. <br /> E. LUMP SUM 10,004 136,452 140.526 <br /> Per Operating Budget Proposals <br /> $4, I I I expended as o(I /31 /04 <br /> TABLE 4 <br /> 2004 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT <br /> DEPARTMENTAL ADMIN FEES Revenue <br /> Solid Waste Sewer Vehicle Disposal Total Acct No. <br /> Fees 205,780 139,952 11,307 357,039 3401.46 <br /> Budget 12,666,010 7,895,905 1,680,200 22,242,115 <br /> of Budget 1.62% 1.77% 0.67% 1.61 <br /> Per Operating Budget Proposals <br /> TABLE 5 <br /> 2005 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT <br /> DEPARTMENTAL ADMIN FF,ES Revenue <br /> Solid Waste Sewer Vehicle Disposal Total Acct No. <br /> Fees 405,513' 283,232 29,632 718,377 3401.46 <br /> Budget 17,425,252 7,430,663 1,716,200 26,572,115 <br /> /o of Budget 2.33% 3.81 % 1.73% 2.70% <br /> % FCC <br /> nerease <br /> rpm P!Y 97% 102% 162%; 101% <br /> Per Operating Budget Proposals <br /> TABLE 6 <br /> 1, Departmental Admin Fees: <br /> What does Departmental Admin. Fees cover (Revenue Acct. 3401.46)? <br /> r Why was there a 41.14% increase ($145,796 in FYE 2002 to $205,780 in FYE 2003)? <br /> `v Why is the administration of the Solid Waste Fund almost 50% more costly than for the Sewer <br /> Fund? <br /> <br /> a Final Budget: $224,930. <br /> Page 10 <br /> <br />