My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0423.003 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0423.003 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 12:01:06 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:42:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0423
Point
003
Author
Constance R. Kiriu, Legislative Auditor
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC: Close file - 4/19/04
Document Relationships
AGE FC 04/19/2004 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Finance Committee (FC)
BIL 189 Draft 01 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0423.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If the Shipper's Wharf Committee Trust Fund is included in the CAFR, what is the <br /> extent of the independent audit and will it affect the current audit contract? <br /> Since the Shipper's Wharf Committee Trust Fund is reported in the CAFR, it will be subject to the <br /> independent audit procedures. Audit procedures cover confirmation of the Trust Fund's year-end <br /> cash and investment balances, as well as the performance of analytical review procedures over the <br /> Trust Fund's interest earnings and cash disbursements.20 <br /> KPMG, the County's current independent auditor, does not anticipate having to amend the <br /> County's independent audit contract given the limited activity and fund amount of the Trust Fund. <br /> An amendment to the current audit contract would be warranted should the County request an <br /> audit opinion on separate, stand-alone financial statements of the Trust Fund or additional <br /> compliance work. The scope of the audit work would determine the increased cost of the <br /> contract.Zl Trust funds should reimburse the County if the scope of work should increase. <br /> 3. COUNTY LIABILITY <br /> What is the liability to the County and what measures might be taken to reduce <br /> liability in view of the Trust relationship? <br /> An important objective of the Council should be to minimize risk to the County. As noted in <br /> Deputy Corporation Counsel Craig Masuda's attached memorandum, "extent of liability to the <br /> County is minimal, but increases relative to the amount of control the County Council exerts over <br /> the trust exercised as a governmental entity." The Legislative Auditor's Office has recommended <br /> that the Council not create a 'special fund' by ordinance for an altogether different reason. <br /> Greater liability, including potential personal liability, is another compelling reason. <br /> The County may still be named in a complaint due to the Mayor's role as a trustee or the Director <br /> of Finance as its administrator. The extent of liability to the Mayor or the Director of Finance <br /> depends upon the nature of the case and isfact-specific. Deputy Corporation Counsel Craig <br /> Masuda informs that the office would defend the Trust as the purpose of the Trust is a public <br /> purpose and a municipality is allowed to expend resources on the administration of the trust. <br /> Trust funds would be used to defend the actions of the trustee pursuant to <br /> Section 554A-3(24), HRS. <br /> Ultimately, dissolving the Shipper's Wharf Committee Trust Fund and transferring the funds to the <br /> County would eliminate personal liability of the mayor (trustee) and the director of finance (trust <br /> administrator) under trust statutes. These actions would require returning to the Court. <br /> FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Although the underlying issues of the Shipper's Wharf Committee Trust deal with policy, <br /> accounting and auditing, and exposure, they are complicated by the fad that the Trust is a <br /> creature of the Court, it falls under trust statutes, its public' purpose must be distinguished from <br /> <br /> 20Ralph Kanetoku, KPMG, letter dated March 11, 2004. <br /> <br /> 21 Ibid. <br /> 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.