My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0560.005 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0560.005 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 9:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0560
Point
005
Author
Cheryl Reis, retired Hawaii Police Major
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 5/04/04
Document Relationships
AGE PC 05/04/2004 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 248 Draft 01 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0560.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would be added to the area on a daily basis. This adds the <br /> potential of increased traffic accidents, robberies, burglaries, <br /> thefts, other property crimes, domestic and other types of <br /> disturbances, and general calls for police services. Add <br /> fires, medical emergencies and other calls for Fire/EMT <br /> services with an increased volume of 911 calls, and you tax <br /> an already stretched Public Safety network. I believe that <br /> the Developer has undertaken a very ambitious venture and <br /> considering its scope, a realistic attitude toward his <br /> contribution to our County infrastructure should be imposed. <br /> Specifically, the Developer should be assessed the cost of <br /> increasing both police, fire and 911 dispatch personnel in a <br /> reasonable amount to be calculated by the County. <br /> Additional support personnel within the 2 agencies should <br /> also be considered and an assessment made for those as <br /> well if applicable. Operational facilities should also be <br /> included on the project site to accommodate calls for service <br /> without taxing those already in place for the greater Hilo <br /> area. The Developer's benefit will be lasting in his service to <br /> the residents/users of the area and less strain for the rest of <br /> us. <br /> Most of the residents on the lower Kaumana/Punahele <br /> section of the project are either retired or young families with <br /> growing responsibilities and limited or fixed incomes. So my <br /> second point or question would be, how would the project <br /> impact the infrastructure for them as, for example, an <br /> increase in property taxes perhaps. If existing resources <br /> <br /> along this area such as sewer lines be used, what is the <br /> impact on the existing neighborhoods. Almost everyone <br /> <br /> contacted on my petition drive in those neighborhoods <br /> <br /> grabbed eagerly for the pen to sign up to deny the proposed <br /> project. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.