My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0560.006 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0560.006 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 9:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0560
Point
006
Author
John & Pamela Lipscomb
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 5/04/04
Document Relationships
AGE PC 05/04/2004 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 248 Draft 01 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0560.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Section 25-6-46. states that "After adoption of a project district enabling ordinance, the <br /> applicant shall submit to the director detailed site plans for the project district <br /> development". Section 25-6-46 (d) states that "if the director fails to render a decision on <br /> the site plans within the prescribed period ("within 60 days after the acceptance of the site <br /> <br /> plans"-Section 24-6-46 (b)), the site plans shall be considered approved without further <br /> certification by the director" <br /> QUESTION: Given the size, scale, and duration of this development, can the director <br /> make a thorough, sufficiently critical review of the site plan within 60 days and present <br /> carefully detailed requirements to the developer that may be needed to protect the public`s <br /> interests? Does the director have the staff resources and expertise to handle such a lazge <br /> and complex application in so little time? What if there aze other lazge projects submitted <br /> <br /> at the same time? Given these constraints, wouldn't the Council be wise to en• on the side <br /> of caution and not grant the requested rezoning until all relevant issues can be adequately <br /> addressed? <br /> <br /> Attachment to 5/4/2004 Testimony to Hawaii County Council <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.