My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0647.008 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0647.008 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 11:43:49 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:53:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0647
Point
008
Author
Constance R. Kiriu, Legislative Auditor
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC: Close file - 7/22/04 Presented: FC - 7/22/04
Document Relationships
AGE FC 07/22/2004 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Finance Committee (FC)
BIL 280 Draft 02 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0647.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Length or term. The term of the BID is set initially at five years; whereas, the CFD <br /> (Chapter 32) is directed towards funding improvements of any real or other tangible property <br /> with a useful life of five years or longer. <br /> Determination of assessment to bene£t received. The BID allows the assessment to be <br /> based on benefit received by a parcel of land, the cost of making the service available to the <br /> property, the cost of services and improvements benefiting the property, the state of <br /> development or use of the property, the occurrence of one or more events related to <br /> development of all or certain properties, or any other reasonable basis or formula determined <br /> by the council. The ID requires the cost of improvements to be assessed against properties <br /> that are specially benefited by the improvements. CFD does not require that the special tax <br /> imposed be fixed or apportioned on the basis of special benefit to be conveyed by the <br /> improvement or that the improvement convey a special benefit on any property in the district. <br /> The County must only determine that the property is improved or benefited by the <br /> improvement in a general manner or any other manner. <br /> 3. Who determines the amount of money needed"? <br /> When the Council adopts a subsequent ordinance establishing the BID, the ordinance <br /> contains the district boundaries, the scope of services to be funded, a budget for the first <br /> fiscal year, the method of assessment, the parameters of County service known as base line <br /> services, and indemnity and insurance clauses. The budget and the method of assessment <br /> together would determine the assessment amount for the first year. Future annual <br /> assessments are determined by the board/association and its budget, provided a 10 percent <br /> variance requires Council approval. <br /> A copy of the Waikiki Special Improvement District No. 1 is attached for your information. <br /> This ordinance is an example of the next step in BID implementation. <br /> -1. When or how often are the assessments collected? <br /> The assessments are collected by the Director of Finance simultaneously with the owners' <br /> real property taxes (usually twice a year.) <br /> <br /> 5. The percentage required to institute proceedings of a B/D (25% of total assessed value) is <br /> less than the percentage required to protest or stop the BID (51 % of total assessed value or <br /> SO%+1 owners in district). <br /> The difference in the amount of owners required to petition the improvement district is <br /> customarily less than that required to automatically stop the project. The 25% is also <br /> consistent with City and County's ordinance, which was used as a model. <br /> For an ID, the percentage of owners who may petition can be 0% (council-initiated), 20%, <br /> 60%, or 100%. If a protest is made by 50% or more of the owners of assessment units, the <br /> improvements cannot be made contrary to the written protests. <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.