COM 0400.092 2002-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

d. Includes State facilities (i.e., major roads, schools) assuming that the State will enact legislation authorizing the counties to collect impact fees on behalf of the State; e. Establishes a tiered system of growth management proposed to consist of rural-agricultural areas (where concurrency would not apply since rural- agricultural preservation measures would limit growth), central city/village core (where concurrency measures would be flexed to encourage infill, and CIP priorities would be high), and the urbanizing active growth area (where concurrency would focus); f Relies on a GIS database and annual reports to account for approved projects and monitor public facility capacities; g. Requires the environmental report already required for rezoning applications to include public facility impact analyses; h. Requires the planning director to include a recommendation of concurrency in the staff report for a rezoning application; i. Identifies the General Plan as the appropriate policy document to include the Level of Service standards; j. Includes mitigation alternatives and reimbursement provisions for excess contributions. 3. Develop the technical basis to implement the concurrency management system: a. Conduct studies to define Level of Service Standards. This study could double-function to serve as the basis for impact fees; b. Incorporate the LOS for the various infrastructure facilities into the General Plan; c. Develop GIS database and modeling systems to account for approved projects (debits to capacity) and completion of planned infrastructure improvements (credits to capacity); d. Develop impact analysis methodology for applicants that complements GIS database and modeling systems; e. Develop an Official Map system to identify CIP projects and preserve acquisition opportunities; f Refine the CIP system to include an annual reporting of capacity as the basis for selecting and prioritizing projects. 5