Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> V' 'm acts <br /> Just becauso the plan has not yet been fleshed out doesn't mean we can't settle now upon <br /> some required mitigation measures. The application acknowledges the need to "blend <br /> <br /> with the existing terrain" and t0 minimise interference with view planes. T believe the <br /> most effective way to do that is for the County to impose special building requirements as <br /> conditions of approval, My observation has been that CC&Rs that are up to the developer <br /> or community association to formulate and enforce do not work. I therefore ask you to <br /> formulate the most important ones and, by making them conditions of rezoning, retain. the <br /> power to enforce them. <br /> First of all, it is not enough to say that tiew planes will still be available on the State land <br /> to the north, so it doesn't matter so much what happens on the project site. It does <br /> matter. I believe there should be a substantial setback from the highway. The Northwest <br /> Hawaii Plan which the application says gives its blessing to this project calls fora 300' <br /> buffer along the highway. The Planning Department proposed a setback of 100' in its <br /> recommendations to the Plannutg Commission on the SMA permit application. The <br /> developer objected to such a setback, but since the public welfare and protection of this <br /> unique coastline are of highest priority, I urge you to stand firm on this. <br /> Either there should be a 100' buffer, or no roof should protrude about the level of the <br /> highway, or--preferably-- both. If this is too difficult, then the project should be <br /> downsized or "clusterized" to make it work. There should be a height limit of something <br /> like 15' near the highway, the shore, and at ridgetops. Better yet, there should be no <br /> building at all on ridgetops. Elsewhere, the height limit should be about 20'. <br /> Earth-tone colors should be required, and should not be compromised by white-rail fences, <br /> as happened at Kohala Ranch. Any fences or enclosure walls should be of wire, narural <br /> stone, weathered wood, or a brown material. No wall or fence or line of shrubbery should <br /> be used along the highway to shield the project from view, as that would detract from the <br /> natural open character of the area and would interfere with the view plane. <br /> There should be an upper limit on floor area, how much of the lot can be gaded, and how <br /> much of the lot can be landscaped. Outside air conditioning units should have to be in <br /> bafr7ed enclosures. Lighting at the entrance should be as low key as it is at Kohala Ranch. <br /> Any street lightening within the project should be no more than three or four feet above <br /> grade, and for the purpose of indicating intersections only. <br /> Wood roofs should not be allowed, no matter how fire retardant the manufacturer may <br /> claim they are, as their installation could adversely affect insurance ratings for the whole <br /> area. To construe the Island's electrical resources, solar collectors, with or without <br /> attached tanks, should be encouraged. Termite prevention should be by gavel barrier <br /> rather than poison under the house slabs. Drought-tolerant plants should be required for <br /> the bulk of the landscaping, and lawns should not be allowed. This will not only conserve <br /> 2 <br /> <br />