My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0272.003 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0272.003 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2017 11:12:59 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:52:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0272
Point
003
Author
Laurel A. Dekker, Executive Director, Recycle Hawai‘i
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 5/20/97
Communications - File Code
FND/CIP
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 05/20/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A new study <br />examines material <br />recovery and mixed <br />waste processing <br />facilities. <br />By Eileen Brettler Bereny4 A.D. <br />aterial recovery facilities have doubled in number since 1993, as mixed <br />waste processing facilities only increased marginally; MRFs are <br />currently processing less tonnage per facility than they were a few <br />years ago, but are handling more types of materials; and finally, MRFs <br />have not embraced technological advancements in sorting as previously expected. <br />These arejust some of the findings in an updated survey to be published as part of the <br />1995-96 Materials Recovery and Recycling Yearbook: A Directory, Atlas, and Guide" <br />by Governmental AdvisorvAssociales.IIIc., Westport, Corm. <br />This article discusses the results of that national survey on :MRFs and MWPFs, <br />which allows for comparisons and the analysis of trends. It is the third such study <br />conducted since 1990. But before discussing the findings in more detail, it is useful <br />to define what is meant by a MRF and MWPF. <br />The GAA study focuses on the municipal solid waste stream. Thus, to be <br />included, a facility had to process some degree of residential recyclables. Projects <br />that handled exclusively industrial <br />or commercial wastes were <br />excluded. In addition, construc- <br />tion and debris facilities were not <br />included. Finally, recycling centers <br />and drop-off centers where <br />recyclables were returned, but not <br />sorted, were not a part of the <br />study. <br />A MRF is defined as an <br />installation that separates some <br />portion of commingled <br />recyclables into individual streams <br />of marketable materials. The <br />marketing of the recycled materi- <br />als to brokers or end users is also <br />an important function of the <br />facilities. MRFs typically use both <br />machinery of various degrees of <br />complexity and human labor to <br />separate the various materials. <br />The processing that occurs at a <br />MRF may be as complicated as <br />separating a single stream of many types of recyclables (paper included) arriving at <br />the facility, or as simple as separating various colors of glass from a pre-sorted glass <br />stream and ferrous metal containers from a commingled metal container stream. <br />The one characteristic that all MRFs in the study share is that they are receiving <br />only recyclable material - they are not processing unsorted municipal solid waste. <br />The complexity of material recovery facilities is increasing in relation to <br />the types of materials that are being accepted and marketed. <br />38 AUGUST 1995 HECYCUNG TGGAY <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.