Laserfiche WebLink
Pepe`ekeo Community Meeting September 16, 2004 <br /> Bill 49, llr. 3. Agricultural Land Taxation <br /> Regarding the shorter dedication period for certain circumstances, the Finance Department <br /> representatives explained that for leasehold properties where the leases are less than 10 years, or where <br /> the lease has less than 10 years left on it, there will be consideration for a shorter dedication period. <br /> In the current law. if you are dedicated for 10 or 20 years and there is a disability or disaster, the <br /> rollback would apply. "Chat provision is being changed to cancel the penalty in the case of disaster or <br /> <br /> disability of the primary farmer. It was stated that in the case of disability a document from a medical <br /> professional would be required. <br /> Currently if you breach a dedication, the rollback taxes plus a 10 percent penalty would apply. The <br /> <br /> example of Hamakua Sugar Company was used. In that case, the land was dedicated to Ag for 20 years. <br /> On the 19'x' year the company fell. The rollback taxes and penalty amounted to approximately $18 <br /> million in that case. As a result, the County acquired 4.500 acres of Hamakua land. <br /> For farmers who do not wish to dedicate or who are not in commercial activity., the land values for <br /> non-dedicated Ag use would be twice as much as the dedicated Ag values, which would still result in <br /> low taxes. <br /> Mr. Johnson asked if this would apply to someone who wanted to lease their property for five years. <br /> Mr. 'Takaba replied in the aftirmative. <br /> Mr. Johnston asked how he could set aside aone-half acre portion of his 2 'h acre property from the <br /> <br /> dedication, which would contain two acres of vegetable crops. He said that one-half acre portion had <br /> shot up to $400. Mr. Takai stated he should fill out the Ag use form. <br /> Bill 49 removes the 20-year Ag dedication from the program. The 20-year dedication program enabled <br /> the property owners to qualify for their land to be assessed at one-half the 10-year Ag use dedication <br /> value. History has found that 20 years is too long-term for most people. <br /> Mr. Johnson asked what would happen to the land owners who were currently in the middle of a 10-year <br /> dedication with the new proposal, if the dedication would start again. Mr. Takai replied that the <br /> dedication would continue. Mr. Takaba replied that rollback taxes for a breach would be less severe if <br /> changes occurred during this transition. Mr. Johnson requested a provision in the bill for this situation. <br /> that people with land already enrolled in the program should be grandfathered, and it should be stated in <br /> the bill. Mr. Takaba stated the department would look at language for that. <br /> At this time, questions ensued regarding the second page of the handout, which shows three examples <br /> of 20-acre parcels with different types of situations. Mr. "Cakaba explained that in the previous law if a <br /> person is living on Agriculturally zoned land the homesite is considered a farm dwelling and the Ag use <br /> rate applies. The second home built is still considered a farm dwelling. If homes continue to be built, <br /> restrictions may be incorporated. Ur. Itolschuh asked if there was a restriction on the number of farm <br /> dwellings, to which Mr. Takaba replied there could be any number of farm dwellings. <br /> Mr. Anderson asked how the Tax Uftice would appraise a homesite on Ag dedicated land. Mr. 'Cakai <br /> stated they would look for a comparable homesite and appraise it accordingly, the homeowners rate <br /> would apply to this portion. The remainder of the parcel would qualify for the Ag use rate. <br /> Yage 3 <br /> <br />