Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />11/1/1999 <br />Why are the Roads so Congested? Sprawl as a Primary <br />Cause of Congestion <br />Back to Table of Contents <br />Sprawl as a <br />Primary Cause <br />of Congestion factors Contributing to the Growth in Driving <br />The Texas �icreasc in <br />Ta�cE'i3 <br />Transportation Trips Ta <br />Institute's data Increase in <br />indicates that the Trip Lengths <br />almost 70% increase 35c:� <br />in driving in the last <br />16 years is a primary Decrease <br />cause of congestion. in vehicle <br />The factors that Occupancy` <br />contribute the most to 17% <br />that increase are at <br />least partially related <br />to sprawling switch to <br />development Drivingincrease in <br />patterns. According to 17% Population <br />the figure (right) 13% <br />published in a U.S. <br />Department of <br />Transportation study, Source: Travel Behavior Issues in the 90's. U.S. Department of <br />as much as 69% of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Washington, DC, July 1992: <br />the growth in driving p• 14. <br />between 1983 and 1990 was caused by factors influenced by sprawl. These factors <br />include the same people driving farther, as well as a decrease in carpooling and a switch <br />from biking, walking, or transit to driving. These changes are in part necessitated by the <br />spread of subdivisions and office parks isolated from stores and schools. Residents are <br />often left with no real alternative to driving. One of the unintended consequences of this <br />growth pattern has been a steadily growing number of vehicle trips that has served to <br />clog local streets and freeways with traffic and increasingly frustrate residents and <br />workers. At the same time, the chart shows that population growth accounted for only <br />13% of the growth in driving. <br />STPP conducted a rigorous analysis' of more recent data (1992-1997) to examine the <br />relationships between the growth in driving and other factors measured by TTI. STPP <br />analyzed the growth of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) versus the growth of population, <br />growth in the size of the urbanized area, increase in the number of highway lane miles, <br />and initial density of the urban areae. This analysis demonstrates how the spreading out <br />of the metropolitan area has contributed to an increase in driving. TTI's data reveals that <br />every 10% growth in the size of an urbanized area generally has resulted in a 2.5% <br />increase in miles driven, over and above the increase in driving that comes from <br />population growth or other factors. The influence of additional road capacity, another <br />outgrowth of sprawl, is discussed later in this paper. <br />This analysis indicates that our current traffic congestion problems are not an inevitable <br />result of the normal, healthy growth of our metro areas. These problems are more closely <br />linked to the sprawling development patterns that require so much driving. <br />