My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0560.027 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0560.027 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 9:03:42 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 1:00:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0560
Point
027
Author
Amy Mahealani Jones
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 10/18/04
Document Relationships
BIL 248 Draft 03 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0560.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
contributing to the vast amounts of water in tubes below the surface. I believe <br /> this is only one example of the way water moves through this area, and that it <br /> is probably only a small, relatively insignificant amount of water compared to <br /> other areas within the project area. <br /> 2) In the revised proposal dated September 21, 2004, mention is made of zones <br /> AE and A on Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Where aze these zones located <br /> within the property? I have not seen these zones superimposed on maps of the <br /> proposed plans for comparison, so I imagine the Council also has not seen a <br /> compazison. It would seem difficult to make an informed decision as to the <br /> advisability of this project without understanding updated flood zones and <br /> insurance studies. <br /> 3) Also in the Sept 21 revision is mention of improvements to be made by the <br /> applicant, "according to a schedule meeting with the approval of the <br /> Departrnent of Public Works:" (page 15) <br /> "7. Widen the northwest bound approach of Mohouli Street to provide dual <br /> left-turn lantjs to mauka bound Kaumana Drive," and <br /> "8. Widen the mauka leg of Kaumana Drive to provide an auxiliary merging <br /> lane in the mauka bound direction." <br /> My question is, does the County plan to widen Kaumana Drive in order to <br /> accommodate the 2 left-turn lanes? If so, I expect that these will be at <br /> taxpayer expense. Have these expenses been provided for in the County <br /> budget? <br /> 4) On the same page, number 4 says "Provide stop control on Ponahawai Street <br /> to Mohouli Street, with separate left-turn and right-tum lanes to Mohouli <br /> Street." <br /> Since the opening of the Mohouli extension, I have seen the traffic increase so <br /> much that it is very difficult to turn left from Uluwai onto Mohouli, especially <br /> during morning commute hours. It can take me up to 5 minutes to turn left. <br /> With additional cazs on the road from the new Ponahawai extension, I imagine <br /> there will need to be a stop light, not just "stop control" to keep traffic <br /> moving. Has the County also budgeted for a stop signal here? <br /> I also wonder about the close proximity of the Kaumana-Mohouli-`Ainako <br /> intersection, the Uluwai-Mohouli intersection, and the Ponahawai-Mohouli <br /> intersection. These will all be located within a range of only a couple of <br /> hundred yards, Is this going to be safe for our citizens? <br /> <br /> 5) If the Council votes to approve the rezoning for development and the land <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.