Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> To: Hawaii County Planning Department <br /> From: Emmeline de Pillis <br /> Date: Friday, February 6, 2004 <br /> Subject: Opposition to Western United Life Assurance Co. University Terrace proposal <br /> As a Hilo resident, I appreciate the opportunity to share my concerns about the proposed University <br /> <br /> Terrace development. While others have raised compelling objections to this proposal on environmental <br /> <br /> grounds, ' I will address the community impact. <br /> <br /> What does this elan lack? <br /> <br /> This proposal does not give UH Hilo students and other members of the UH-H community the "college <br /> town" amenities they crave, for one simple but insurmountable reason: It is not within easy walking <br /> distance of the main campus. I have taught Management 425, the business planning course at UH Hilo, <br /> for several years. In this course, the students write a plan for a business that they feel the community <br /> needs. This assignment invariably provokes a discussion about the lack of restaurants, housing, shopping <br /> <br /> and entertainment on or adjacent to campus. Students do not want these things one or two miles away. <br /> <br /> "These amenities must be within five minutes' walking distance from the main campus, and convenient for <br /> students without cars. Anything further away will simply compete with the other shopping, dining, and <br /> housing options already availahle in town. <br /> <br /> What does this plan have? The hallmarks of a very large suburban slum": <br /> • Lack of major employers within easy walking distance. (Phis is probably the most important <br /> predictor of success for amixed-use development). <br /> • No meaningful, long term barriers to inappropriate tenants or architectural eyesores. <br /> • Small lot size and high density. <br /> • Erosion of commercial and residential rental rates, both within University "Terrace and in East <br /> Hawaii overall due to oversupply of available units. <br /> Worse, while run-down inner cities have successfully undergone renewal, suburban slums do not rebound. <br /> Once a suburban area begins to deteriorate, homebuyers move on to newer properties. Suburbs do not <br /> possess the character, history, energy, or perceived intrinsic value of city centers. Historically, preservation <br /> societies have shown little interest in expending the tremendous energy and expense it would take to <br /> revitalize a mn-down suburb. Once underway, the deterioration of these blighted communities <br /> accelerates, and area residents must live with the consequences. <br /> Halting suburban sprawl limits traffic congestion, preserves property values, encourages revitalization of <br /> city centers, and benefits the community and the environment overall"'. I respectfully implore the <br /> Planning Commissioners to deny the zoning changes under consideration today. Thanks again for taking <br /> the time to consider this testimony. <br /> <br />