My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0821.004 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0821.004 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 6:39:08 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 1:02:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0821
Point
004
Author
Claudia J. Rohr
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 11/09/04
Document Relationships
BIL 355 Draft 01 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
BIL 356 Draft 01 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0821.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> * There was some discussion concerning details but the discussions were disconnected <br /> from the issues of the permits. There was no discussion concerning why the amendments <br /> were applicable to the subject matter of the permits or what public interests had been <br /> given up or not pursued in exchange for exclusive fishing rights and cash contributions. <br /> <br /> * This procedural error shows how far a field CP operates. CP is encouraging the <br /> neighborhood association to pursue the hope of exclusive neighborhood gain instead of <br /> pursuing their rights under public domain laws. By holding up the neighborhood <br /> association's support and approval CP is eschewing the meaning of public interest. <br /> <br /> *CP's preference for private negotiated agreements effectively foreclosed public <br /> observation and participation in the government process in violation of the sunshine law. <br /> <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> *You must hold this ordinance in committee until you get all issues resolved. You don't <br /> have enough information to proceed. The Council needs to step up to the plate and help <br /> the Planning Director whose hands are tied by the Settlement Agreement. You can use the <br /> rezoning ordinance to leverage positive change. Don't let the County be blamed for not <br /> doing their job. You must make sure there won't be a big mess in the end like Hokulia. <br /> <br /> Listening Device: <br /> <br /> Also, the County has failed to maintain the listening device over the past year and I have <br /> not been able to hear very well without it. The listening device installed in this room is <br /> the only device that allows me to comprehend and participate fully in hearings. I have <br /> been at a disadvantage in the hearings that have taken place for over a year. I have been <br /> properly requesting the listening device as an ADA accomodation which I did this time. <br /> <br /> I feel there has been willful neglect and consideration in this matter. I am beginning to <br /> find this repeated occurance suspect. I am asking for continuence and asking that the <br /> Council keeps the ordinance in committee until the next Hilo meeting because the County <br /> failed to provide the device as required by ADA. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> / JIts 1~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.