Laserfiche WebLink
Iionorabie Leningrad Elarionoff; Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee ou Planning <br /> HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 5 <br /> June 14, 2004 <br /> Despite a major effort in the past year, spearheaded by an Agricultural Working Group of <br /> about 50 active participants, including all county planning directors, the IAL bill died in <br /> conference committee this past session. <br /> We should not continue to wait for state action. The state land use law, H.R.S. Chap. <br /> 205, and the zoning enabling law, Chap. 46, clearly give the county the power to enact <br /> programs to protect agricultural land through the General Plan and zoning. County action <br /> will not replace the constitutional mandate on the State, and any county lands identified <br /> for protection will not have to meet the 2/3 standard for rezoning established by the state <br /> constitution for important agricultural lands, but the County should be diligent in trying <br /> to protect good ag land. Unfortunately, some passages in Draft 2 suggest that the County <br /> should not take any action until the state has acted, such as "When identified by the State, <br /> protect and encourage the utilization of the County's important agricultural lands." <br /> (p.42). <br /> It is not essential that the term "Important Agricultural Land" be used, as long as the <br /> <br /> _ ~ policies exist that protect these lands, whatever they are called. Some of the areas mapped <br /> as important in Draft 1 are open to question, and I am willing to work on better mapping. <br /> in particrdar, the category of "fair for 2 or more crops, on an irrigated basis", can be re- <br /> examined. <br /> Significance of the LUPAG Maps and Role of the General Plan <br /> Under the current General Plan, any rezoning must be consistent with the LUPAG maps. <br /> If not, the rezoning is inconsistent with the General Plan and must be rejected. Sec. 3- <br /> 15(b) of the County Charter provides that "no public improvement, project, subdivision, <br /> or zoning ordinances, shall be initiated or adopted unless the same conforms to and <br /> implements the General Plan." The requirement for map conformance explains why, For <br /> example, projects such as Prince Kuhio Plaza or the "Hawaiian Riviera" needed to obtain <br /> a General Plan map amendment before they could even be considered for rezoning. <br /> Without the requirement of map consistency, the General Plan is not a guide to rezoning. <br /> The verbal policy statements in the General Plan are so broad that some can always be <br /> found that will justify a particular rezoning action. <br /> Although it has been the practice for many years to require map cousistency, to remove <br /> all doubt from this point, Draft 1 contained an explicit statement on this, on p. 340, along <br /> with some Curther guidance on the relationship between the General Plan and rezoning. <br /> <br />