My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0042.042 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0042.042 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2019 2:07:52 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:17:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0042
Point
042
Author
Bill Eger
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 1/4/05
Document Relationships
BIL 163 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 163 Draft 02 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0045.030 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0493.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General Plan, a law enacted by this body in 1989, very clearly establishes public <br /> participation before a revision is written. Section 6, Ordinance 89-142, which we are <br /> discussing changing, states: <br /> "(2) In proceeding with the comprehensive review, the Planning Director shall give <br /> notice of the comprehensive review to the Planning Commission, Council, and the <br /> general public. The notice shall state: <br /> (a) The general scope of review; <br /> (b) The ability for the Public and Council to provide their input to the <br /> Planning Director within 45 days after the date of the notification. <br /> "(3) Upon receipt of suggestions from the public, the Planning Director shall review <br /> the General Plan, the assumptions upon which the policies were drawn, including <br /> the suggestions for change. Within 90 days the Planning Director may propose draft <br /> amendments, and shall give notification to the County Council and the public of <br /> any proposed amendments." (emphasis added) <br /> In Revision Draft 1 the public is mentioned but their 45 days to act before writing <br /> begins is left out of the process: <br /> "(2) The Planning Director shall give notice of the comprehensive review to the <br /> County Council, Planning Commission, and the general public. The notice shall <br /> state: <br /> (a) The general scope of review; <br /> (b) The ability for the Couatv Council, Planning Commission, and the <br /> general public to provide their comments and suP,aestions to the Planning <br /> Director and <br /> (c) The initiation date, schedule of events, and time for completion of the <br /> review period. <br /> "(3) Upon completion of the review period, the Planning Director shall conduct <br /> public workshops on the proposed amendments. <br /> "(4) The public shall be afforded 60 days from the date of the Iast public workshop <br /> to provide comments to the Planning Director." <br /> <br /> In other words, the public gets to comment only after the Planning Deparment writes <br /> the Revision. That is what happened -illegally in Draft 1, before you. If you pass <br /> it you will incorporate illegal acts as law and endorse the Planning Department's <br /> open and cynical refusal to obey. What is going on here? <br /> ---Bill Eger, Page 2 <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.