Laserfiche WebLink
BECAUSE USING THE SIX CRITERIA SET FORTH IN <br /> THE TEXT ON PAGES 345-346 OF THE PROPOSED <br /> <br /> UPDATED GENERAL PLAN FOR "IMPORTANT <br /> <br /> AGRICULTURE LAND" WE FIND THAT THE LOWER <br /> HONALO LANDS DO NOT MEET ANY OF THE SIX <br /> CRITERIA: <br /> 1. THEY WERE NOT IDENTIFIED AS <br /> "INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE" IN THE 1989 <br /> (CURRENT) GENERAL PLAN -SEE OUR <br /> EXHIBIT C-2 THAT SHOWS THESE LANDS <br /> WERE CLASSIFIED AS "EXTENSIVE <br /> AGRICULTURE" OR "ORCHARD" IN THE 1989 <br /> GENERAL PLAN. <br /> 2. THEY WERE NOT IDENTIFIED AS "PRIME" <br /> OR "UNIQUE" BY THE STATE IN ITS <br /> AGRICULTURAL LANDS OF IMPORTANCE <br /> TO HAWAII (ALISH) -SEE OUR EXHIBIT C- 3 <br /> WHICH SHOWS THAT THEY WERE <br /> CLASSIFIED AS "OTHER" OR "NOT AT ALL" <br /> WHICH MEANS THEY ARE NOT IMPORTANT <br /> AGRICULTURAL LANDS TO THE STATE. <br /> 3. THERE ARE NO CLASS A SOILS AND ONLY <br /> A SLIVER OF CLASS B SOILS ABOVE THE <br /> 1,000 FT ELEVATION ACCORDING TO THE <br /> UH LAND STUDY BUREAU -SEE OUR <br /> EXHIBIT C-4 WHICH SHOWS THAT THE SOILS <br /> ARE LARGELY D OR E WITH A LITTLE C AND <br /> A SLIVER OF B. <br /> 4. THEY HAVE NO IRRIGATION AND NONE IS <br /> PLANNED AND THUS THEY DO NOT FALL <br /> UNDER THE "FAIR" OR BETTER <br /> <br />