My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0042.030 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0042.030 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2019 2:07:53 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:17:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0042
Point
030
Author
Virginia Aste
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC Public Hearing - 1/3/05
Document Relationships
AGE PC 01/04/2005 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 163 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 163 Draft 02 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
BIL 163 Draft 03 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0045.030 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0045.049 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0493.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> FROM :LRULIMR PUNK GRRDEN FRX N0. :608 966-7421 Jan. 02 2005 03: 26PM P2 <br /> ~4nty General Plea. Puraiuia Ante. PAGE 2 <br /> PUMA COMMUNTI'Y DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> The Puna Development Plan, written in 1995, followed the language of the <br /> existing County General Plan and provided recommendations and <br /> suggestions far itaplementation. Many of those suggestions are still <br /> applicable and reflect the results of a community based planning process. <br /> The criix of the plan is to preserve the rural lifestyle of Puna, but many <br /> people also want fire and police protection, dust enough," ec~omic <br /> development to provide jobs, and open space for recreation. With a build out <br /> potential population of 150,000 plus, the Puna District needs a plan of its <br /> own to avoid the type of congestion now occurring on the West Side. <br /> The Puna Developmem Plan suggests a number of mothods to accommodate <br /> and finance needed infrastructure: Rural Town Districts, Redevelopment <br /> Districts, Land Readjustment (lot consolidation and ro-subdivision), Transfer <br /> of Development Rights. Scheduling and timing of capital improvement <br /> projects and advance land acquisition (for public facilities and schools) caa <br /> save taxpayer dollars and facilitate clustering of businesses and service <br /> centers. These ideas have been used successfully in other jurisdictions and <br /> can be implemented here. <br /> MI33ING PIECES <br /> Tax dollars must be allocated to the Puna District until parity is achieved in <br /> County personnel and facilities. The CGP should identify this need. <br /> Requests for federal (and state) funding o8en require statements of intent in <br /> the general plan of a county requesting funds for housing or transportation. <br /> The General Plan should include such language. <br /> The CGP should acloyowledge lava zones and flood plains. If existing <br /> commercial zones conflict with lava hazard zone designations, then <br /> commercial zoning must be provided is other areas. If lots in certain areas <br /> are prone to flooding, or tsunami, then zero home building should be <br /> allowed. Continued bulldozing and building without regard to changes in the <br /> draieage maps or natural co-occurring phenomena will only cause costly <br /> damage in the future. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.