My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0042.081 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0042.081 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2017 9:30:50 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:20:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0042
Point
081
Author
Claudia Rohr
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 2/02/05
Document Relationships
BIL 163 Draft 05 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0042.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To summarize, by approving Draft 5 of the General Plan, as is and containing B-2, you are <br /> voting to: <br /> 1) "undo" a possible enforcement action by DLNR Commission on Water Resource <br /> Management; <br /> 2) "approve in principle" issuance of DLNR Water Resource Management permits to <br /> HCPC retroactively; <br /> 3) "approve in principle" final and permanent alteration the two streams; <br /> 4) "approve in principle" an administrative zoning change which will by pass the public <br /> review process; <br /> 5) "approve in principle" that HCPC's coal ash pile qualifies for an SMA permit. <br /> The stockpile has exceeded the capacity of the facility and has spilled into the Shoreline <br /> Management Area (SMA) and is now less then five hundred feet from the shoreline. It is <br /> time for the County Council to focus on protecting our water resources by opposing B-2 <br /> as an attempt to "back door" in approvals legitimizing a solid waste facility that is <br /> inappropriately located. For this reason I am asking that the Council amend B-2, changing <br /> it back to Intensive and Extensive Agriculture (its original land use element). I am asking <br /> for the same favorable consideration you gave others when you amended the General Plan <br /> by floor amendment on January 4, and 21, 2005. <br /> Our Planning Director can then handle his "technical problem" of fine tuning the <br /> agricultural land use element by amending the LUPAG map from Intensive and Extensive <br /> Agriculture to Important Agriculture at his own timing without derailing any pending <br /> State enforcement actions and without risk of back door zoning approval. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> <br /> Claudia Rohr <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.