Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Feb 14 OS 08: 02p Rieh.arrJ Hoeflinger 18081982-7324 p,s <br /> Section 4-29(b) -Remove the second word (hunting). There is a hunting dog <br /> with a license, but no such thing as a licensed hunting dog. <br /> Section 4-31(d) (5) - In the past, tattoos were the stlrldard for dog <br /> identification. You may want to include prominent tattoos as an alternative <br /> for microchips. <br /> Section 4-31(fl -Needs clarification. The statement that an enforcement <br /> officer has power of arrest may be inconsistent with section 4-1(i), which <br /> states that only a police officer has such power. <br /> Section 4-31.1(a~ -Same comment as preceding, regarding power of arrest. <br /> Section 4-32 -Are hearings limited to the third circuit court? <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> "The most serious concern with this draft document from a hunting <br /> perspective is the large increase in the cost of licensing the number of dogs <br /> that many hunters maintain. It is one thing to charge Fluffy's owner $25 <br /> every other year to license her pet, but something else to increase a hunter's <br /> cost by $150 for the dogs in his kennels. Unreasonable demands invite <br /> noncompliance. <br /> Section 4-I(a) refers to dogs as "customa.ry pets, maintained solely for <br /> persona] enjoyment and companionship". That may define Fluffy, but not a <br /> hunting dog. Unlike a pet, hunting dogs are bred for, and expected to work <br /> for their keep. In many homes on the Big Island, they put meat on the table. <br /> It is recommended that the ordinance recognize the difference between <br /> hunting dogs and pets, and suggest that the term "working dog" be used to <br /> describe hunting dogs, cattle dogs, etc. It is further recommended that a <br /> reduced fee schedule be established for such animals. These animals have <br /> value, and rarely run free. They are not the cause of the problems that the <br /> proposed ordinance is directed to correct. A valid hunting license or a <br /> farmer's or rancher's business license might be nsed as proof of animal use. <br /> [t is assumed that part of the cost of animal control involves animal and <br /> owner identification. Installation of microchips should reduce that cost <br /> 4 <br /> <br />