My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0022.043 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0022.043 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:18:21 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:24:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0022
Point
043
Author
Steven Hurt, President, Big Island Bird Hunters
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
PSPRC: Close file - 3/21/06 Council: Referred Bill 4, Drafts 5 and 6, and all related communications back to the Public Safety and Parks and Recreation Committee - 2/15/06 Presented: Council Public Hearing - 3/10/05
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 02/15/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE PSPRC 03/21/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Public Safety & Parks & Recreation Committee (PSPRC)
BIL 004 Draft 05 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0022.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 412,a <br /> Why such large fee increases for dog licenses and no fees for any other domesticated <br /> animals? The increase is to much for many d the pig banters who are staying a~ of <br /> public assistance and are doing many state and federal agency's by helping to keep <br /> pig numbers down. Let as not forget the culture miortare that makes THE BIG <br /> ISLAND what it is. <br /> Why should aR monies received ender CHAPTER 4 be it tees or fines go into the <br /> spay neater program? Why are we a pie's animals to be spayed <br /> or neutered. Should not these He edacatlon, proactive <br /> is always better than know what a f e domesticated <br /> auimal is about to be d e p ve heat cyde. individual owners <br /> be responsible for their~vn ! Th" no diffe nce in tag fees! <br /> • t <br /> The requirement to "tender t river to <br /> undeserved rLsks. - <br /> ~ ' <br /> . The animal may be a <br /> . The animal may attack. <br /> . The average motorist is not gaali[fed to treat an iq(m~ed animal, <br /> .The driver may encounter verbal and or physkal abase by We owner H the animal <br /> is a domesticated animal. <br /> Section 4-16 <br /> `Where shall be a penalty...for each violation a[ subsection[s] or [b] of this section. <br /> We disagree completely with this automatic penalty. Seep )a mind that the animal <br /> could be a stray. Why should the driver be tined for s negligent ad ~ the animal <br /> owner? If the animal is indeed a stray, it seems like a devious way to add to the <br /> coffers of the H[JMANE SOCIETY or ANIMAL CARE CENTER, 6y Ming the <br /> <br /> driver and owner simultaueoasly. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.