My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0022.049 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0022.049 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:18:35 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:24:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0022
Point
049
Author
Carol R. Campbell
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
PSPRC: Close file - 3/21/06 Council: Referred Bill 4, Drafts 5 and 6, and all related communications back to the Public Safety and Parks and Recreation Committee - 2/15/06 Presented: Council Public Hearing - 3/22/05
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 02/15/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE PSPRC 03/21/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Public Safety & Parks & Recreation Committee (PSPRC)
BIL 004 Draft 05 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0022.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
should be at least a $150 fine because there would be no added expenses. <br /> Owners of barking dogs should be ticketed and fined out of court unless they decide to appeal. <br /> <br /> Why do we have to clutter up the courts with petty things like this? Once again it should be <br /> <br /> expensive the first time and increasingly so with each new offense. Any action that results in a <br /> <br /> ticket to a dog owner should also require proof that the dog is licensed, or a license should be <br /> issued at that time. <br /> <br /> All moneys from Animal Control fines and fees should be earmarked for Animal Control so they <br /> can afford to enforce the laws. Obviously, I would levy stiff penalties for dog owners who do <br /> not prevent their dogs from being problems. I would also limit the number of dogs and cats <br /> allowed on a residential property -this might vary with the size of the property: lots over half <br /> an acre could have one or two more animals then the 10,000 sq foot city lot, but it is <br /> reasonable to assume that the more dogs, the more barking will occur. <br /> Carol R. Campbell <br /> HC 1, Box 4127 <br /> Keaau, Hi 96749 <br /> 808-982-8307 <br /> xntrk@hotmail.com <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.