My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0022.054 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0022.054 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:18:40 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:25:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0022
Point
054
Author
Josephine Keliipio
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
PSPRC: Close file - 3/21/06 Council: Referred Bill 4, Drafts 5 and 6, and all related communications back to the Public Safety and Parks and Recreation Committee - 2/15/06 Presented: Council Public Hearing - 3/22/05
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 02/15/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE FC 07/21/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Finance Committee (FC)
BIL 004 Draft 05 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0022.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 oft <br /> Murashige, Laura <br /> From: Josephine Keliipio [Josephine@poidogs.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:17 AM <br /> To: Council Testimony <br /> Subject: BILL NO. 4, DRAFT `,i -ANIMAL CONTROL <br /> Dear Mr. Safarik, Mr. Jacobson and County Council Members, <br /> I oppose Bill No. 4, Draft 5 because it completely fails to acknowledge "animal <br /> guardians" whose animals are part of their family and "rescue people" who bring <br /> unwanted strays into their household and raise them as part of their family. My <br /> specific concerns about this Draft are as follows: <br /> Article 1. Definitions. <br /> Section 4-1. Definitions. <br /> i) In Section 4-1 (a), tFie definition for "Animals" should not include "Domesticated <br /> Animals" or animals treated as family members who are under the care of animal <br /> guardians. <br /> 2) In Section 4-1 (b), "I\nimal Care Center" should also include a sanctuary for <br /> stray or unwanted animals. <br /> 3) In Section 4-1, there should also be a definition for "Animal Guardian," who are <br /> persons who treat animals as members of their family. <br /> 4) In Section 4-1, (o), "~Dwner" should also include the "owner of other animals <br /> besides just a dog." <br /> 5) In Section 4-1, (v), "Stray" should not include a currently licensed dog whose <br /> license is not attached since the license could have been lost when the dog got <br /> out or the dog may have escaped from his enclosure and while in his enclosure he <br /> was not wearing his license. <br /> ARTICLE 3. Dog License Fees <br /> Section 4-12. Fees. <br /> 1) In Section 4-12. What was the intent of raising the fees to such an outrageous <br /> amount? Was it to make money for the county? or was it to discourage responsible <br /> animal guardians from rescuing unwanted dogs? Or was the intent to make sure <br /> that as many dogs as passible are licensed considering that many of us are average <br /> wage earners and not rich mainland newcomers? <br /> (a) the fees for a sterilized dog should be no more than $5.00 and <br /> (b) the fees for an unsterilized dog should be no more than $15.00. <br /> <br /> ARTICLE 4. Prohibitions Z2,Sy <br /> Gomm. No._ <br /> Ref. To: h~p~Z~lJ1AM <br /> i;~f. _-or~_MAR Z ~ " <br /> 3/22/05 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.