Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Rpr 30 OS 02:20p 18081 325-1120 p-~ <br /> ¦ Ill <br /> ~CvN~l p~tlrsades 'states G'anr~ruN~t~ ~ssvc~~~ tt~~u~r <br /> Posl Olf~ce Box 2223 Kailua-Kona. Hawaii 96745-2223 <br /> August 20, 1996 <br /> Mr. Brian DeLima, Chairperson <br /> Hawaii County Council <br /> 25 Aupuni. Street <br /> Hilo, Hawaii 96720 <br /> Subje KaimiNani Drive Traffic & Connectc,r roads <br /> Dear Councilm c~a: <br /> The matter of traffic density and vehicle mix on Kaia,i- <br /> Nani Drive in the Kona Palisades subdivision has been of seri- <br /> ous concern of the residents for several years. The loco- <br /> of our concern is SAFETY. KaimiNani Drive was origin?11! clr--- <br /> signed and built as only a residential access road, .ar:d ,is <br /> such has well over 150 direct access driveways along its <br /> Length. After the road was dedicated to the County, ~r, ex- <br /> tension from the makai end of the Palisades subdivisi:~r. <br /> Queen K highway was built by the county, thus creatiar ti-._ <br /> mauka-makai Mamalahoa to Queen K connector road. Tr.atfi,. <br /> surveys show an average daily flow of about 4000 vehi._Ies <br /> going through the subdivision. Moreover, this topic :,as <br /> been discussed with various Council members, Plannin;~ Di:-=c- <br /> tors, State legislators etc., and resulted in passag~_ of a <br /> County ordinance limiting the size of trucks using the c~aC <br /> only as a by-pass. Again, the motivation was SAFETY. P.:- <br /> other action by the County was to agree to delay new adja- <br /> cent subdivision developments until a new mauka-maka:L con- <br /> nector road NORTH of the Palisades was constructed. ~'The:~ <br /> when the so called-"YO-TSA <br /> c-" onnector road was opened SOU:iI <br /> of the Palisades, the adjacent development restrictic:,s were <br /> lifted in spite of the Association's protests. Subse~uer._ <br /> traffic surveys showed a negligible reduction, if ana, ca~.~sed <br /> by the new connector road, proving that a road NORTH :f <br /> KaimiNani is badly needed. <br /> Now we are encountering the matter of north-sou,eh con- <br /> nector roads from the new adjacent subdivisions to Kai;ai2;ani <br /> Drive. While we understand the motivation for such c=oss- <br /> connectors, we again wish to emphasize our opposition becausa <br /> of SAFETY concerns. <br /> <br />