Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> SEP-30-9T TUE 03:36 PM P. 03 <br /> PRGE 2 <br /> We do not feel this specific proposal Is bad. In fact, there are 3 me <br /> Teatures to the application which make It superior to what we've segn in <br /> previous zoning approvals within the Rgricultural District.. Nonetheless, <br /> the Kona Farmers' Rlliance would Ilke to put three concerns on the <br /> Record. This resulted from discussions during our most recent p; blic <br /> meeting at Kunawaena High School on September Z5, 1997. <br /> First: We would Ilke to make certain that covenants placed on the <br /> land Is one hundred percent binding, so there is no possible way the <br /> current or suture owners can be released from the forty year restric ion. <br /> Second: We believe that no approvals should be granted that re- one <br /> land from Rgricultural to Rgricultural Project District, justified by the <br /> assumption that the land is "marginal agritultura) land". It is our b lief <br /> that much of the land in South Kona is "Important Unique RgriCUlt ral <br /> land". Therefore, untU our District can be properly reclassified on , oth <br /> the State and County levels to reflect this, any re-zoning based oil the <br /> above assumption is premature. We want to make certain tls t a <br /> precedent is not established by this specific approval, if granted. <br /> Third: We believe that reclassification of land into the Rgritult ral <br /> Project District should occur as part of a comprehensive Regional ; lan <br /> for our area, as mandated by the Hawaii County General Plan. We eel <br /> that parcel by parcel, piecemeal re-zoning is not in the best long-t rm <br /> Interest of South Kona. <br /> Thank you for this opportunity to make our position part of the <br /> record. <br /> Respectively Submitted by the KDNR FRRMERS' RLLIRNCE STEE~I'ING <br /> COMMITTEE: Gus Brocksen, Larry Baird, Paul Hliburn, John Langens ein <br /> and Nancy Plsicchio <br /> <br />