My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0225.009 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0225.009 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 2:47:16 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:30:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0225
Point
009
Author
Mary Ann K. Todd-Waller
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 6/01/05
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 06/01/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
COM 0225.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
RES 083 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
RES 084 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.r~lary .Ann .x" ~od~f~all <br /> r <br /> 73-4z8o .Keokeo Street, .Kailua-.Kong .lfazvaii 96740 ysoo, Phone /808/ jzs~i83 <br /> 5/18/05 Council Testimony, RE: Resolution 84-05, Condemnation of <br /> Matsumoto Road, Road Lot B, TMK 7-3-005-111. <br /> I am resident and co-owner of a CPR'd lot in the Matsumoto Subdivision <br /> with a 1 /20`~ interest in the recorded road maintenance agreement for the <br /> Matsumoto Road parcel 1 l l and a 1/80` ownership interest in the Road A <br /> aka Foster Road or TMK 7-3-005-101. <br /> I am testifying today in hope the County and Council will reconsider <br /> opening the Holu-Keokeo Street connector road due to our safety and <br /> liability concerns. I realize this resolution only addresses the Matsumoto <br /> roadway lot, however I fear once the County pays her the County will be <br /> compelled to open the Holu-Keokeo connector regardless of our safety <br /> concerns and possible liability. <br /> By now I hope you all know about the great injustice done to the residents of <br /> the Keokeo Street area when the County removed the original County <br /> standard barricade with an expired construction right of entry agreement <br /> obtained from a party that did not have a vested or ownership interest in <br /> either of private road sections of Keokeo Street on July 1 1, 1996. <br /> In my letter to Gerald Takase on April 29`x, which Council members <br /> received for the May 3`d committee meeting, I thanked him for explaining <br /> the reason the County didn't do a title search, (which was because the title <br /> company wanted too much money), and ended the conversation feeling <br /> assured that he would deal with our ownership interest and liability <br /> concerns. While Mr. Takase acknowledged the convoluted ownership of <br /> parcel 101, he said that the County's plan was to proceed with process for <br /> opening the connector based on the deeds the County had received and see if <br /> <br /> anyone came forward. Well I came forward and let him know I would let <br /> <br /> the rest of the owners know what is happening. <br /> <br /> I found out Monday that Corp. Counsel was going to withdraw the <br /> <br /> resolution because they had received or were getting a deed from Mrs. <br /> <br /> Matsumoto and Gerald Takase may have prepared the deed for her. Because <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.