Laserfiche WebLink
Barbara Scott Page 2 of 4 <br /> development. The fact that other development has occurred in floodways should not set aprecedent-it <br /> was ill advised. <br /> Water Commitment niscrepancy <br /> There is some confusion about exactly how many water commitments are available for the <br /> Pualani Makai Project. In recent meetings, Mr. Fuke stated that S l0 water units are available: however, <br /> in the March 23, 2004 Water Board Meeting, Westpro Development, Inc. received only 368 water units <br /> for the project area. Through the Kealakekua Source Agreement Pualani Estates, Inc., the Water <br /> Board approved the water unit reassignment to Weslpro Development, Inc. and nothing has occurred to <br /> create more available water units for TMK (3)7-5-017:001 or TMK (3)7-5-017:019. <br /> I'hc <br /> <br /> action was approved at the March 23, 2004 Water Board Meeting. DWS records do not indicate any <br /> <br /> additional units provided for the project area, but that is also another matter related to regional <br /> infrastructure. As a matter of due diligence, please review the specifics related to the number of water <br /> units available for the Pualani Makai Project. <br /> North Kona is under a Water Conservation Notice, and the May 17, 2004 advisory stands <br /> regarding water quality in the Nurth Kuna legal Notice. DWS continues to grant additional water <br /> <br /> commitments as our well infrastructure cannot adequately meet current demand. As of the first of the <br /> <br /> year, North Kona outstanding water commitments totaled 10,078 units. When you recall that each unit <br /> represents 600 gallons of potable water per day, the number becomes a formidable 6,046,800 gallons per <br /> <br /> day in water use beyond what is currently distributed. The North Kona water system cannot support any <br /> <br /> additional development before current wells are operational and additional wells are developed. <br /> Pua'a Devclo~m_c_nt, LLC <br /> It is necessary to call to your attention the questionable business structure of the Pualani Makai <br /> Project. I have reviewed the Planning Commission Meeting transcript and attended the Public IIearing. <br /> I have heard the same assurances as everyone else that the two Limited Liability Companies arc separate <br /> 5/31 /2005 <br /> <br />