Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> <br /> Presented Questions <br /> 1. Does the Bankruptcy Court know that, the Hamakua Housing <br /> Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "HHC"), will be <br /> "swapping" or exchanging Lands that does not belong to them <br /> but belongs to the Hawaiian Heirs??? As you have indicated <br /> in your letter, that "it is our opinion that the Hamakua <br /> Housing Corporation is in fact a nonprofit organization as <br /> defined under section 2-110(a)(4).. where did this quotation <br /> come from??? Did you do your research as a Corporate council <br /> attorney, if these lands in question are cleared by way of <br /> a Quiet title??? <br /> 2. Are you aware, that the Bankruptcy Court, only allowed the <br /> fiduciary rights of "HHC" to transfer only those lands that <br /> has clear title??? The u.s. Bankruptcy Court did not stipulate <br /> exchanges and "swapping" of these lands!!! <br /> 3. Has the "HHC" quiet the Lands, in Papaaloa known in this <br /> case, to be "highly disputed???". So, what was the Civil Number <br /> in the Circuit Court case, that awarded "HHC" these lands??? <br /> 4. Did the HHC'S articles of incorporation or By Laws stipulate <br /> that they were in the Reality Business??? What license are the <br /> "HHC" using to do land transactions???. (HHC is practicing <br /> under Nudum Pactum). <br /> 5. Should the county decide to "reinitiate" the above entitled <br /> RE: 415-96, you can count on a future Civil Law Suit, to be <br /> filed against the county and, the Hamakua Housing Corporation, <br /> for "illegally" exchanging those lands with the county!!! Has <br /> "HHC" produced any Certificate of Transferred land documents??? <br /> Remember, if these lands are "quit" claim, this kind of claims <br /> are unwarranted!!! <br /> 6. How did "HHC" acquire these lands, anyway??? Do you know, <br /> that, the "HHC" is an "agent„ to the demised Bankrupt Hamakua <br /> Sugar Company???. Besides, having an "invalid" conveyances, <br /> violates the IRS, mandatory policies. <br /> 7. Do you know what is the penalty for thief??? In the first, <br /> second and third degree??? As an accomplice, the Corporate <br /> Counsel will be aiding and abetting a criminal charge and shall <br /> be sued, along with the rest of the thieves!!! (Thou shalt not <br /> steal). These acts are in violations of 41 section. 1983 <br /> u.s. code and title 10 section 241 u.s. code both of which <br /> states "deprivation of rights under color of law." Due to the <br /> fact, that there is two or more such persons committing such <br /> Criminal acts, that the county and "HHC" are conspiring, with <br /> each other, will have penalties applied to them. According <br /> to the record, in November 1996, when this disputed case was <br /> being heard in Kona, Mr. Gionini had "lied" under oath, for <br /> the "HHC," having their 501(c)(3) status, at the time "HHC" <br /> <br />