COM 0106.069 2004-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Page 1 of 2 Espejo, Darlene . From: Greg and Claudia [gt-ct@hawaii.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 8:40 PM To: Mayor Kim; Isbell, Virginia; Pilago, K. Angel; Arakaki, James; Safarik, Gary;.piQjs~r;h~'li; IFrekl~~k~gl~, i~ - Donald; Higa, Stacy; Jacobson, Bob Cc: David Foxman; David Foxman; Allen Kaneshiro; Bob Clark; Connie Vohden; David Galvan; Ron Stafford , _ Subject: Suffolk/Pua a Developement Mayor Kim and County Council Members, I writing in regard to the Suffolk/Puaa development proposal. My wife and I were at the May 3, 2005 council meeting in Kailua Kona. We were quite impressed by the large turn out and pleased that the council felt it important to have the meeting in the community where the proposed development may be located. It seemed to me that the overwhelming majority of people in attendance at this meeting were opposed to the Suffolk/Puaa development. I believe one of the council members, Pilago?, indicated that 83% on those in attendance were opposed to the development. The primary reason for the opposition, per citizen comments, was the lack of adequate infrastructure, the existing problems with traffic in the area considered for the development, and the over- crowding of local schools. spoke in opposition to the development, my concerns were, lack of infrastructure, the existing traffic gridlock during most days, the addition of 800-1000 daily car trips in the area of the proposed development, and the lack of adequate parking spaces in the proposed apartment complex. In addition, the states inability to control the promise of low rents for the proposed apartments (this county does not have a rent control agenda nor the personnel to enforce rent control). The potential that Suffolk/Puaa could sell the development when completed and the new owner could invalidate all promises made to the county is also a concern. I question that this development will accomplish what it proposed, to help minimize car travel to work, to shopping, and etc. Is this proposed development located near major employers? I don't believe that anyone at the meeting was opposed to the concept of affordable housing . Affordable housing is lacking in this community. The opposition stems from the lack of planning and infrastructure. Build adequate roads, build additional schools, develop an uninterrupted corridor to the only hospital in the area, insure that affordable housing is located in areas where it will best serve those who qualify, and involve the community in the long range planning process for this community. Then we can move forward and can consider developments of this nature. Please reject this project until the community concerns have been remedied. Thank you for your consideration of this matter, Greg and Claudia Taylor Comm. No. ~ 75-110 Halahua Place Re#, Uare 6/9/2005