Laserfiche WebLink
S l9 N. W .2d 243 Page ~ <br /> (Cite as: 519 N.W,2d 243,'247) <br /> proper use of governmental power to protect aze not adequate as to her based on an assertion of <br /> substantial governmental interests if the protection is lack of time and/or money. The trial coon noted <br /> reasonable and narrowly tailored. appellant's position on this issue but properly found <br /> that these alternative means of communication are in <br /> [4] The requirement of narrow tailoring is addition to the posting of one opinion sign at any <br /> satisfied if the regulation promotes a substantial time and additional opinion signs during the election <br /> government interest that would be achieved less season. Cf. Gowazd, 456 N.W.2d at 468 (a total <br /> effectively absent the regulation. Rock Against ban on one form of political expression, namely, <br /> Racism, 491 U.S. at 799, l09 S.Ct. at 2758. The lawn signs, was unconstitutional). <br /> regulation need not be the least restrictive or leas[ <br /> intrusive means of furthering the government's Reasonable regulation and the reasonable use by a <br /> interests. Id. at 798, l09 S.Ct, at 2757-58. governmental entity of police power is as essential <br /> to the first amendment and frce speech as the right <br /> Because the ordinance allows appellant to post at of frce speech itself. Concededly, the framers of <br /> least one opinion sign, which can contain multiple our United States Constitution and its Bill of Rights <br /> messages, on one or multiple issues, at any time of mandated the judiciary to scmtinize the exercise of <br /> the yeaz, it is reasonably and narrowly tailored. The governmental police power. But the framers also <br /> ordinance contains a modification for election assumed that the exercise of some police power was <br /> season. The City can reasonably conclude that the reasonable, did happen, that it would happen, and <br /> concerns for aesthetics and public safety are served that i[ would be essential in a democracy. The <br /> by the one sign (multiple message) limit that is in complete absence of regulation and a total lack of <br /> effect most of the year. The City can also police power is the definition of anarchy, of chaos. <br /> reasonably conclude that the balance shifts in favor With anarchy the right to put downs or hundreds of <br /> of fewer limitations during the short election season. signs on one's lawn would be for naught since <br /> See Gowazd, 456 N.W.2d at 464 (only the anyone disagreeing would simply walk into your <br /> narrowest range of restrictions should be imposed by yard, knock them over, and if you attempted to <br /> the city on political speech, the core of first rebuild them, simply stay on the lawn and knock <br /> amendment protection). We find no merit in them over again. <br /> appellant's assertion that [he City's reasons for the <br /> <br /> ordinance are pretexmal. The City of New Brighton's amended ordinance <br /> balances the City's inherent substantial interest in <br /> Alternative channels of communication. aesthetics, residential home value, visual clutter, and <br /> traffic hazards with the right of its residents to <br /> [5] To be constitutionally valid, a regulation must express opinions on nonpolitical, political, and <br /> <br /> not impair the speaker's ability to convey a message business-oriented issues. <br /> <br /> to the desired audience. Gowazd, 456 N.W.2d at <br /> <br /> 467-68. Alternative channels of communication DECISION <br /> <br /> must exist and must be adequate. Taxpayers for <br /> Vincent, 466 U.S, at 812, 104 S.Ct. at 2132. Here, This New Brighton sign ordinance does not <br /> <br /> appellant can present one or more opinion messages violate first amendment principles of frce <br /> <br /> on one sign on her property at any time, and expression. The trial court properly granted <br /> <br /> multiple signs with multiple messages during the summary judgment in favor of the City. <br /> <br /> election season. This satisfies the requirement of <br /> alternative channels of communication. Although Affirmed. <br /> <br /> we do not rest our decision on this point, we agree <br /> <br /> with the trial coon's observation that, in addition to END OF DOCUMENT <br /> <br /> the signage and the multiple messages, there are <br /> alternative means to express opinions such as <br /> <br /> handbills, picketing, and letters. <br /> '248 Appellant argues these additional means of <br /> communication--handbills, picketing, and letters-- <br /> Copr. o West 1996 No claim to orig. U.S. govt. works <br /> <br />