My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0454.014 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0454.014 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2015 3:53:57 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:56:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0454
Point
014
Author
Sherry Bracken, Sign Committee Chairman, Kona Outdoor Circle
Communications - Referred To
PWPC
Comments
Presented: PWPC - 8/18/98
Document Relationships
AGE PWPC 02/02/1999 1998-2000
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1998-2000\Public Works & Parks Committee (PWPC)
AGE PWPC 02/16/1999 1998-2000
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1998-2000\Public Works & Parks Committee (PWPC)
AGE PWPC 08/18/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Public Works & Parks Committee (PWPC)
BIL 280 Draft 03 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kona Outdoor Circle--Comments to Proposed Sign O diva=-ice Bi l No. 280 8117/98 <br /> Page 2/5 <br /> Section 3-8, Signs prohibited in all districts(Pace 7): <br /> Comment: Sandwich board signs which have become "permanent"in nature should <br /> be specifically disallowed. llany businesses have ended up using sandwich board <br /> signs, not to promote a temporary event such as a real estate open house, but on a <br /> day-in, day-out basis (Gold's Gym, as an example). The signs are small,portable, <br /> easily moved about, and those locally seem to end up oftentimes in pedestrian right- <br /> of-ways and along the road shoulders where bicyclists travel. They are an example <br /> of clutter that the KOC would like to avoid. Also, Section (1)leaves too much room <br /> for individual interpretation. Specifying"sandwich board" signs from one business <br /> displayed more than two days in a rosy as part of what's prohibited will help define <br /> much of what is being referred to in Section (1). <br /> Section 3-9, Exempt signs. <br /> Page 8. (1) Any sign of a temporary nature... <br /> Comment: How does one define temporary? Should there be more definition? <br /> Page 8, (A) Announcing Sign: ...thirty-two square feet in area... <br /> Comment: Thirty two square feet is too large. <br /> Page 8, (B)Real Estate Sign ... any sign not e;,ceeding eight sq uare feet in area... <br /> Comment: We have measured residential real estate signs. The signs themselves <br /> are 24"x 18", or 3.5 square feet. Adding in the pioeard at top with the agent's <br /> name generally makes the entire area less than 4.5 square feet. We would suggest <br /> that residential real estate signs be limited to 3.5 square feet, with a provision that <br /> allows one agent name placard to be added,making the total sign area no more than <br /> 4.5 square feet. <br /> Page 8, Section(C) Subdivision Improvement Sign.. ...not exceeding thirty-two feet... <br /> Comment: Thirty-two feet is too large. The developer should be required to report, <br /> via a standardized form, to the chief engineer in advance of erecting the sign, not <br /> thirty days afterwards. Does the developer have to apply for a permit, or are we <br /> just taking this one on the honor system? We believe one sign should be all that's <br /> allowed,not"one per mile or fraction of mile." <br /> Page 9, (2) Any small sign not exceeding two so,;are feet in area. <br /> Comment: These should not be exempt. This sounds like it could be the proviso <br /> under which International Motors was allowed to fny multiple flags. We are very <br /> concerned about exempting small signs, since interpretation could be varied and we <br /> want, above all,to avoid having this lovely island loch like Coney Island. (No <br /> offense to Coney Island intended.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.