Laserfiche WebLink
. Aug-03-98 14 : 01 Sandra Scarr 808 334 1930 P _ 02 <br /> KONA OUTDOOR CIRCLE <br /> \ 76-62,80 Kuakini Highway <br /> '� Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 <br /> RE: RESOLUTION NO. 148-97 <br /> (0SIGN ORDINANCE <br /> Article 4 - Sign Regulations (page 12) <br /> - Section 3-4-1 (1) My two signs per business on street <br /> frontage? (2) Why shall both signs bo of a different type? <br /> Under Change - 4) "repeated requests for variances for properties <br /> granted special or use pf its.t, <br /> THE GRANTING OF VARIANCE PIAUESTS samm BB CURTAILED. VARIANCE <br /> AT IS A SIGN O I GOOD OD IP IT IS <br /> NOT GRANTS I .ADHERED TO ? Mil SD O ' �Y THE PLANNING <br /> STRICTLY <br /> COMMISSION? <br /> - Section 3-4-3 (Paq 13) Exempt signs. i have a problem with <br /> exempt signs in the first pleco. . .and_ how can an exempt sign be <br /> allowed to be thirty-two square feet in area? See Change 3) on page <br /> 15: ". . .enlarging present allowable size of 24 eq. ft. to 32 sq. <br /> ft." If they want to ster,d .rd•i.ze allowable size, why don't they <br /> maXe them all 24 sq. ft.? <br /> - Section 3-4-4 (C) Should be deleted. As written, (C) <br /> would <br /> cancel (A) and (3) by saying temporary signs and banners are exempt <br /> from this article. They could say any temporary sign or banner <br /> would have to meet the reglirements of all the sections listed, <br /> without making it exempt from the requirements of (A) and 03) . <br /> - Section 3-4-5 (page 17) Change - enlarge signs from 6 s <br /> sq.t. to 8 sq. ft. tato facilitate enforcement and clarity." <br /> o <br /> wants Ala sign in a resid _tia1 d_.=trict, except for a small "For <br /> Sale" signIf these <br /> ,�-ne. e a1lo d, why allow them to be <br /> 4 larger than theexisting <br /> 4 17) (1 ) Ground sign. (A) There's <br /> - Section 3-4-6 f p�'P,r 1 f a 3 Z �.c;. ft. sign were two feet wide <br /> byym16fee wrong it would thi u{r ements of this section, but <br /> 16 feet high moot the g�����. This section should <br /> insome cases would e3:te~d anyaground sigVe the n to the height of the <br /> building, and no more then <br /> bee clarified to limit16 feet��� meximum height in any event. <br /> "six feet above the <br /> - Same section (3) Projecting sign. • <br /> I don't think <br /> lowest edge of the roof ' <br /> Sava objection as (1) <br /> should be allows hit her ham the roof. <br /> any sign against this one <br /> - Same section (4) Roof r=ign. I'm <br /> altogether. I don't bel: ° signs o 'u1d be allowed on the roof of <br /> any building. <br /> La <br /> ninreea.iC CIW?Art. <br />