Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> op/oJ/UJ :UG 1J.lU /'AA OVV J-J I-D1 1v11Y.. II~.tlVb 11V_u r!J ..W\ Jl• J <br /> MAY-06-2003 TUE 09129 AM P. 02 <br /> Mr. Fritz Johnson <br /> Fritz Johnson, Ina <br /> Page 2 <br /> May S, 2003 <br /> dedication of a pottioa of yom- property fur the Nam Kailas Drive C+ttension at no wst to the <br /> County. <br /> I would be supportive of a change of zone of the subject paroperty from, an RM-1 ro a CV-7.5 <br /> zoned district. Such a change in zoning would ba consisteW with our land use policies for the <br /> errs as detailed by the General Platt and 17te Master Piaot for Kailas-Kona Howovar, please <br /> note that a change ofzoue to a CV-7.S zoned disaiet woWd not allow for ffit increase in unit <br /> count to the 78 runts tegtteeted, but limited to a mattimttm of40 tuba. A CV-zoning also has a <br /> maximum height limit of 30 feet. I would recommend a Resort (V) zoning classification that <br /> would prnnit a mazitnttat unit density of 750 square fed of latad erns pea unit for a total of 66 <br /> units lwssible vn the subject properly. No type of caning exists that would aecotmraodate your <br /> request for a total of 78 tmia oa the propotty. My support of a Resort (V}zoniag for this subj act <br /> prapetty is cotttittgent upon dedication of that pattioat of the subject property necessary to <br /> aceotnmodate the extension ofNaai Pallas ]?diva n no cost ro the County. <br /> I will nut support any request lbr a variance ro allow for a martlmrua structural height in excess <br /> of the forty-hue (45) foot height limit pcbcmitted within both tiro Multiple-PanrilY (RM) sad <br /> lusort (V) coned districts. For yotu iafarwation, CV-zoned disaicts have a maximum her Erin <br /> limit of 30 foot. My position not ro support a variance is based vrt a amendment to the Zoning <br /> Cody adopted last yoax to seduce the mttximttm height permitted oa General Commercial (CG)- <br /> zoned lands within cettaitt portions of t\iorth Kona from 90 feet to 45 feet. To approve an <br /> administrative variance to allow a building to exceed a height of 45 feet would ire toutrary ro the <br /> intent of the County Council to trot allow any sauctttre within Kailua-Kona to exceed 4S fee. <br /> Waxer cotrmutntents ate issued by the Deparnttettt of Water Supply. Preliminary discussions <br /> with a reprascntativc of We pepartment of Water Supply on Apti130, 2003 indicates that water <br /> to accnanmodate a maximum of 68 units can be utsde available to the subject property, subject w <br /> water availability anti the aced ro provide systturr improvements, which may include innsasiug <br /> the size of the water line servicing the subject property .firotii its cutrrnt 6 inches to 12 incites. <br /> The necessary water cvtntuitmenr payment mast also be made. We encourage your client to <br /> contact the Depazaaemt of Water Supply to corlfirm the availability of additional wafer <br /> cottttttitmcnts and obtain iaformatiat regarding necessary water systertt improvements. <br /> Frrrally, we would ]taut no objection ro the use of that portion of the subject property within the <br /> proposed alignment of Mani Kailua Drive for tentporaty patltittg until such time road <br /> construction commences. However, please be mindful that required parking at a ta[io of <br /> 1.?S stroll per unit must be provided on the subject property, We would be willing to entertain a <br /> variance to provide some limited relief to the parking reyuiretnmts and standards, but the <br /> _S <br /> CT <br /> --1' <br /> ~b <br /> <br />