COM 0681.000 2004-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

g. 2-2-37a2 Carol Davis h. 2-3-37:13 Malulani, Inc. i. 2-3-37:14 William and Glynnis Dolan j. 2-3-37:15 Malulani, Inc. k. 2-3-37:16 Kualoa Ranch, Inc. 1. 2-3-37:17 Guy and Andrea Miller m. 2-3-37:18 Kualoa Ranch, Inc. n. 2-3-37:19 Frank De Luz III/Dereck and Laurie Botelho o. 2-3-37:20 County of Hawaii (Exhibits B and C- TMK Maps) 9. The landowners were informed of the proposal to repeal Ordinance No. 487. STATUS OF ORDINANCE 10. Per letter dated May 29, 2003, the Planning Director informed Frank De Luz III that "Because there was never any actual development on the property, the RS-7.5 incremental zoning is not in effect. As a result, the property is in its original zoning A-la. The Planning Department processed the recent subdivision of the property (approved in Apri12001) on the basis of the A-la zoning. The fact that the property has been divided into separate ownership makes it very difficult to apply the incremental zoning at the present time, because it is not possible to determine which area is the first increment, or even if one increment were completed, what would be considered the second increment." (Exhibit D) RECOMMENDATION 11. The 2001 subdivision was granted tentative approval in August 2000 based upon advice from corporation counsel that because the conditions of the RS-7.5 rezoning had not been satisfied, the property should be treated as if it were zoned A-la. The subdivision did not meet standards for an RS-7.5 subdivision. The 2003 letter to landowners was sent to make it cleaz that they could not develop the lots resulting from the subdivision based on the RS-7.5 zoning because the subdivision had been granted on the basis that the A-la zoning was in effect. It is very difficult to apply the conditions of Ordinance No. 487 to the various subdivided properties, especially the incremental zoning conditions. 3