My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0500.001 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0500.001 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 5:33:58 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:57:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0500
Point
001
Author
John Ray, Councilmember Chair, Human Services and Economic Development Committee
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 10/1/97
Communications - File Code
LEG
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 10/01/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
COM 0500.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~.K titcf~y Limited: Changing an Economy Sy Changing its Public =ec`or Page 11 <br /> The SSC also recommends to Ministers the appointment of departmental Chief Executives <br /> who sign performance agreements with their Ministers that specify the targets they and <br /> their departments are expected to meet. <br /> • The major public service union is the Public Service Association (PSA). Since 1987 the <br /> PSA has joined most of its private sector counterparts in one national "umbrella" <br /> organisation, the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (CTU). <br /> Problems that led to the public sector management reforms <br /> In common with most governmental models, New Zealand's pre-1984 public service <br /> structure exhibited a number of problems that required resolution. For at least two decades <br /> Government Departments had been grappling with the problem of greater management <br /> accountability for the effective use of resources. Reforms were clearly required in - <br /> • information procedures; <br /> • corporate planning of departmental programs; and <br /> • more explicit definition of the departmental mission. <br /> Specific problems included - <br /> • The respective responsibilities of Cabinet Ministers and their senior public servants <br /> (particularly departmental heads) was often confused, with unclear delineation of <br /> responsibilities and lines of communication. <br /> • The system encouraged structures that - <br /> - suppressed information; <br /> - -encouraged the "concealment" of cross-subsidies; <br /> - created conflicts of interest, with many departments having a number of <br /> responsibilities, including policy development, advice and implementation, regulation <br /> and/or the provision and/or delivery of service; <br /> - weakened performance incentives because of an overall lack of focus. <br /> <br /> State Sector Act 1988. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.