My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0679.001 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0679.001 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2008 1:20:06 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:50:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0679
Point
001
Author
Sidney M. Fuke, Planning Consultant
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 3/22/06
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 03/22/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
BIL 219 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0679.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SidneyFuke, Planning Consultant <br /> 100 Pauahi Streel, Suite 212 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • Planning • Variance • Zoning <br /> Telephone: (806) 969-1522 • Fax: (608) 969-7996 • Subdivision • Land Use Permits <br /> E-mail: sidfuke@verizon.net • Environmental Reports <br /> March 6, 2006 <br /> , , <br /> Honorable Stacy Higa, Chair <br /> and Members of the Council <br /> HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> 25 Aupuni Street <br /> Hilo, HI 96720 <br /> Dear Honorable Higa and members of the Council: <br /> Snbject: Bill No. 219 -Janice Oshiro <br /> TMK: 2-2-28: 30.32, 33 <br /> In recommending its approval of the subject bill, some members of the Council <br /> <br /> Planning Committee raised questions regarding vehicular movements in and out of the <br /> <br /> subject site and wanted to know of the applicant's (Ms. Oshiro) position on this matter. <br /> I have since had the opportunity to discuss it with the applicant and would like to <br /> share her position with you. While the applicant understands the concerns, she would <br /> <br /> prefer that that there be no condition relating to vehicular restrictions in and out of the <br /> subject property. In so doing, she would appreciate your taking the following into <br /> <br /> consideration: <br /> a. At this point along Kinoole Street, the sight distance is very good, as the <br /> road is fairly straight. As such, visibility in and out of the property should <br /> not be impaired. Although the existing driveway connection is rather <br /> narrow and has a low rock wall, it will be widened. Proposed Condition 6 <br /> requires that the driveway conform to commercial standards. When that <br /> occurs, visibility will be further enhanced. <br /> b. Having a driveway proximate to an intersection may be problematic. <br /> Ironically, in this area, the proximity (and other related factors) makes it <br /> more feasible for left turn movements into the subject site. For <br /> southbound (Puna) movements, Kinoole Street has a dedicated left turn <br /> lane. This lane fronts the subject property. Furthermore, the traffic signal <br /> lights at this intersection also has a dedicated left taro arrow. <br /> Given these circumstances, vehicles attempting to turn left into the subject <br /> property should reasonably be able to do so from the already dedicated left <br /> turn lane. Then, too, the dedicated left turn arrow at the intersection will <br /> cause a break in the town bound traffic, further facilitating left turn <br /> movements into the subject site. With the dedicated left turn arrow, the <br /> only town bound movements along Kinoole Street will be the mauka o(,r~ f <br /> Comm. No. v~~' I - <br /> Rof. To: <br /> Ref, Uate,~~,~.• <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.