My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0739.001 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0739.001 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2008 4:45:03 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:52:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0739
Point
001
Author
Gerald Takase, Assistant Corporation Counsel
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 4 /5/06
Document Relationships
COM 0739.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISADVANTAGES <br /> SALE LEASE EASEMENT <br /> Coun Count Coun <br /> Property no longer available. Government is usually a poor <br /> manager of land (laws prevent <br /> Not party of inventory it from becoming an effective <br /> owner/manager. <br /> Sale process can be <br /> cumbersome and no money County Code is poorly set up <br /> for additional costs. to allow County to be an <br /> effective land manager. <br /> If property, County may have <br /> future use for it. <br /> Hawn Tel: Hawn Tel: Hawn Tei: <br /> Costs are exorbitant. One-time payment. Process is Requires County's fiscal and <br /> Preparation and processing of provided for in the County physical management of lease. <br /> the subdivision application Code. Revenue stream may not <br /> can take up to a year and costs support costs to maintain <br /> in term of County and private fiscal management efforts. <br /> sector man hours are Total surrender of property to <br /> extensive. Public utility the specific use. <br /> subdivisions are supposed to <br /> be exempt from the County's <br /> subdivision code (Sec. 23-11), <br /> <br /> but our experience has been <br /> <br /> that the Planning Dept. is <br /> <br /> reluctant to validate this <br /> exemption and it still is a long <br /> <br /> and ex ensive rocess. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.