Laserfiche WebLink
Communication 681 <br /> Bill 222 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Committee Vice Chair Pete Hoffmann didn't recall specifically what case Council Member Ikeda <br /> was referring to, however he does not think it has anything to do with this case and believes the <br /> Planning Committee should be able to take care of this matter immediately. Vice Chair <br /> Hoffmann doesn't feel postponement is necessary. <br /> Council Member Bob Jacobson noted he was in favor of the postponement with the thought that <br /> <br /> the Planning Director would also be present to answer any questions Committee members may <br /> have. Council Member Fred Holschuh believes the other Matsuno property was located more <br /> mauka in the Komohana area but is not certain, especially since the Committee doesn't have all <br /> the information at this time. <br /> Council Chair Stacy Higa stated Mr. Matsuno owns various pieces of property within the general area. <br /> However, he notes this particular one is held with partner DeLuz and is a very huge lot. Notes the lot <br /> rezoned earlier is located further down from the property referred to in this repeal ordinance. Just wanted <br /> to state that for clarification purposes and is open toNhatever the Committee wants to do. <br /> Following a short recess taken to allow staff to research the matter, Chairman Pilago stated that the <br /> Committee needs to undertake further due diligence and the matter was postponed to the April 4, 2006 <br /> Planning Committee meeting in Hilo. <br /> At the April 4, 2006 Committee on Planning meeting Norman Hayashi gave a brief history of the reasons <br /> for the repeal of Ordinance No. 487. He also explained that the recent zone change of a portion of Mr. <br /> Matsuno's property to Neighlnrhood Commercial is not affected by this repeal and that all of the <br /> properties that were granted an RS 7.5 zoning now reverts back to Ala. <br /> Council Member Pete Hoffmann requested that the Planning Department provide an amended map <br /> depicting the Matsunoproperty that is not affected by this repeal and asked that an amended map be <br /> submitted at the next meeting. <br /> Committee Chair Pilago noted sometimes it does work out where the committee is able to backtrack and <br /> make corrections and urged support of thePlanning Director's repeal of Ordinance No. 487. <br /> There were no statements from the public presented on this matter. <br /> PC REPORT NO. 61 <br /> <br />