Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Testimony Bill 246, Planning Committee April 18, 2006 <br /> <br /> The County is not forced to adopt changes to the subdivision control code. The Planning <br /> Department is being forced to change administrative practices to comply with Chapter 23. <br /> <br /> The Planning Director would prefer to amend the subdivision control code. Bill 246 <br /> gives the planning director complete discretion to defer or waive substantive technical <br /> information on subdivision plans. <br /> <br /> Those items that may be waived on preliminary subdivision plans under section 23-63 to <br /> 23-66 are substantive requirements .integ .integrated from related state and county regulations. <br /> These items are not re-listed as information required on the final subdivision plan, section <br /> 23-69 through 23-70. There is no "technical but non-substantive information" qualifier <br /> for sectiorry23-63 to 23-66 as amended by bill 246. <br /> <br /> Th proposed in Bill 246 do not comply with certain <br /> Federal, state, and county regulations. For example: <br /> <br /> <br /> 1) HRS 46-6.5 Public access, states in relevant part: "(e) The right-of-way shall <br /> be clearly designated on the final map of the subdivision or development..." <br /> <br /> 2) A second example is HCC Chapter 8 Park dedication code, Section 8-12 <br /> (a)(2): which states in relevant parts: "The director shall also determine the <br /> location of the area to be provided in perpetuity at the time of preliminary <br /> subdivision or preliminary plan approval." <br /> <br /> 3) A third example is HCC Chapter 27 Flood Control: <br /> <br /> Section 27-14. Director of public works approval, states in relevant part: "...no <br /> subdivision shall be approved without the approval of the director of public works <br /> with respect to compliance with the provisions of this chapter...." <br /> <br /> Section 27-20. Standards for subdivisions, states in relevant part: <br /> "(b) All subdivision applications shall identify the areas of special flood hazards <br /> and base flood elevations on the proposed site." <br /> <br /> 4) A forth example is the U.S. National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, and the <br /> U.S. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, which requires local government to <br /> implement flood management ordinances and enforce them for a community to be <br /> eligible for continued coverage under the National Flood Insurance program. <br /> HCC Chapter 27 Flood Control Code is currently being reviewed by the DLNR's <br /> National Flood Insurance Program coordinator for consistency with the <br /> requirements imposed by these public laws. The ability to enforce Chapter 27 <br /> will be evaluated. Bill 246 undermines HCC Chapter 27. <br /> <br /> Comm. No. s- (O <br /> Ref. Tot!esertp <br /> Ref. Late 6 <br />