My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0762.032 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0762.032 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 9:12:03 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:57:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0762
Point
032
Author
Janice Palma-Glennie
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close File - 5/02/06
Document Relationships
BIL 246 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0762.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> May 02, 2006, at 08:47:49 AM Janice Palma-Glennie 16 (808) 324-0093 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> make approvals easier for developers is not in the public <br /> interest. <br /> <br /> Some changes might be made to the Subdivision Control Code but not <br /> those that give the planning director more control over <br /> subdivision evaluation and approval. Positive changes would <br /> insure better public notice of proposed subdivision changes, <br /> protection of native Hawaiian rights, and better ways to address <br /> traffic. The Subdivision Control Code should be amended in a <br /> deliberate, comprehensive, and public arena. changes proposed at <br /> this time make the public feel that they are being railroaded into <br /> a program at a time when other significant planning decisions <br /> should be addressed (i.e., the Rona CDP and possible concurrency <br /> legislation). These need to be addressed before the planning <br /> director is given more discretion to lighten the developers' load. <br /> My question remains: why is he proposing these changes at this <br /> time? What reasoning is being used to assure the public that these <br /> changes are in their interest and not developers'? <br /> <br /> Mahalo for your consideration of my views in this crucial matter. <br /> <br /> Best regards, <br /> Janice Palma-Glennie <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.