My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0915.004 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0915.004 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 3:18:23 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0915
Point
004
Author
Peter Malone
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council Public Hearing re Real Property Tax Rates - 5/18/06
Document Relationships
COM 0915.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Peter Melone, melonep@hawaiiantel.net 73-1309 Kaiminani Drive, Kailua Kona, Hawaii 96740, <br /> <br /> Open Letter to Hawaii County Council, May 18, 2006 <br /> <br /> An ordinance was recently passed by the County Council that limits the annual property assessment <br /> increase to three percent for owner occupant homeowners, while allowing other properties to be <br /> assessed at full market value. Thus, non owner occupied properties are assessed at full market value <br /> regardless of the amount of increase due to the market valuation. The current market valued <br /> assessment increases for this year is almost 501/6. <br /> <br /> While the Ordinance has a desirable goal, it is misguided, seriously flawed and will have <br /> undesirable outcomes. The Ordinance is regressive. The more wealthy homeowners have expensive <br /> homes and will benefit the most while the less wealthy homeowners have less expensive homes <br /> and will benefit the least. There are owner occupied homes with market values greater than a <br /> million dollars while many struggle to find and purchase affordable housing. The large dollar <br /> amounts of tax breaks for expensive homes will continue to increase each and every year. <br /> <br /> The 3% limit is a flat rate, but its difference in tax breaks for higher priced home owners will be far <br /> greater than those of lower priced home owners. This difference will be greater each and every <br /> year. This is not property tax reform. It is welfare for the wealthy. It does not contribute to <br /> affordable housing and it will make matters worse in the long run. It is a scam disguised as tax <br /> reform. <br /> <br /> Additional problems are created for the new home owners and for our children and their children's <br /> children, etc. If a resident buys a house from a non-owner occupant this year, then that property is <br /> assessed at 40% more then the home owner with a similar home with the same market value just <br /> because it was purchased before January First 2006. That is significant for this year and it will <br /> become worse every year since the problem is compounded each and every year. That is the <br /> opposite of affordable housing, especially for the future. <br /> <br /> Affordable housing is a hoax for those who work hard, but still earn only $10.00 per hour. Even <br /> two full time jobs will total just $41,600 before taxes. The County's median income of $52,500 <br /> does not leave room for saving or for buying a house. This is a big problem for current renters and <br /> future home buyers, especially those families consisting of three or four generations who live <br /> together. Welfare for the wealthy may attract votes, but it does nothing for affordable housing. The <br /> Ordnance has fallen short; it has missed its mark. <br /> <br /> Vacant lots also increased by a large amount. Those who bought a vacant lot while planning to <br /> build up equality, increase their credit rating and save for future home construction will also <br /> experience inequality. Worse yet are the children who's parents put land and lots aside so that <br /> housing could be affordable for them in the future. They will own property with land assessed and <br /> taxed at a much higher amount than other owner occupants with similar properties having the same <br /> market value. <br /> <br /> Long term rentals will be negatively affected. Whenever there is an assessment decrease in one <br /> property, or one class of property, then all of the other properties must make up the difference in <br /> order to meet the County Tax Levy (Budget). The increased taxes will cause owners to pass it on to <br /> <br /> Conran. No. AISA <br /> Ref. Tor ft~W« CIAMWI <br /> Ref. Dote MAY 18 7006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.