My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0915.004 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0915.004 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 3:18:23 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0915
Point
004
Author
Peter Malone
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council Public Hearing re Real Property Tax Rates - 5/18/06
Document Relationships
COM 0915.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> EXHIBITS <br /> <br /> TABLE IA <br /> Conservative figures are used in this analysis. Rather than a 50% increase, assume a 43% increase <br /> for other properties. The 43% estimate is based on a small sample since the Assessor's Office was <br /> unable or unwilling to supply assessments form last year. Last year's assessments are not available <br /> on line; apparently they were deleted to make way for the new assessments. Appling the above <br /> indicates there is a 40% difference in the assessment between owner occupant homeowner and non- <br /> owner occupant this year; and for a new owner occupant homeowner buying from a non-owner <br /> occupant. This difference and this analysis do not include the already existing assessment <br /> exemptions which will increase this difference. Assume that the new tax rate will be lowered to <br /> $8.10, as per the news release (5-6-05). <br /> <br /> Assume we are comparing two similar properties adjacent to each other and having the same market <br /> value. As an example, listed below are five different hypothetical assessments. Tax brakes for the <br /> owner occupant, as compared to the non-owner occupied properties, will amount to the following. <br /> <br /> Year 1 <br /> 40% of a $300,000 assessment is $120,000 x$8.10/1000=$ 972 tax break <br /> 40% of a $500,000 assessment is $200,000 x $8.10/1000 = $1,520 tax break <br /> 40% of a $750,000 assessment is $300,000 x $8.10/1000 = $2,430 tax break <br /> 40% of a $1,000,000 assessment is $400,000 x $8.10/1000 = $3,240 tax break <br /> 40% of a $1,500,000 assessment is $600,000 x $8.10/1000 = $4,860 tax break <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> TABLE 1B <br /> <br /> Assume for the second year that the owner occupant homeowner has a 3% increase (3% limit by <br /> ordinance) while the other properties increase by a conservative 13%. The difference is 10%. Thus <br /> the accumulated difference is now approximately 50%. Also assume no change in the tax rate. <br /> <br /> Year 2 <br /> 50% of a $300,000 assessment is $150,000 x $8.10/1000 = $1,215 tax break <br /> 50% of a $500,000 assessment is $250,000 x $8.10/1000 = $2,025 tax break <br /> 501/o of a $750,000 assessment is $375,000 x $8.10/1000 = $3,830 tax break <br /> 50% of a $1,000,000 assessment is $500,000 x $8.10/1000 = $4,050 tax break <br /> 501/6 of a $1,500,000 assessment is $750,000 x $8.10/1000 = $6,075 tax break <br /> <br /> <br /> As you can see from the above table, even with conservative market value increases, the regressive <br /> tax gets worse each and every year This is not tax reform, it is welfare for the wealthy, it damages <br /> the economy, and it reduces the inventory of affordable housing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.