My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0915.006 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0915.006 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 3:17:54 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0915
Point
006
Author
Ted Vorfeld
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council Public Hearing re Real Property Tax Rates - 5/18/06
Document Relationships
COM 0915.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
RES 377 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> TESTIMONY REGARDING PROPERTY TAXES <br /> 5/18/06 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> My name is Ted Vorfeld and my wife and I are residents of <br /> Holualoa. We moved from Honolulu to Holualoa 16 years ago. <br /> We have a five acre AG parcel on which we have our home <br /> <br /> plus and Ohana. We raise and sell coffee, macadamia nuts and <br /> oranges. <br /> <br /> <br /> The taxable value of our property has risen 41% in the coming <br /> year over the previous year. Over the previous 4 years, the <br /> taxable value rose only 1%. <br /> <br /> <br /> The current "Market" value rose 100% over the previous year <br /> while during the 4 prior years the market value rose only 8%. <br /> <br /> <br /> Clearly the aberration is due to recent high end property sales <br /> in our area. <br /> <br /> <br /> Tying the assessed value of property to recent sales is neither <br /> rational nor fair. In my specific case, I have no County water <br /> <br /> or road and clearly that fact is not reflected in the assessed <br /> value. Further, my need for County services has not increased <br /> in proportion to the assessed value. <br /> <br /> <br /> Adjusting the rate per thousand dollars of assessed value is <br /> helpful, but it poses difficult `fairness' issues that will likely <br /> lead to the community insisting on a Proposition 13 type of <br /> <br /> assessment. <br /> <br /> I suggest that the County move to a system by which all land of <br /> <br /> a similar classification be assessed at the same value per acre, <br /> regardless of location, and the structures that sit on the land be <br /> <br /> c~ Na 4~~ <br /> Ref. Ta <br /> 1 4 DOte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.