My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0762.067 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0762.067 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 9:10:17 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:57:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0762
Point
067
Author
Christopher J. Yuen, Director, Planning Department
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close File - 6/5/06 Presented: Council - 6/5/06
Document Relationships
BIL 246 Draft 05 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0762.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> with the objectives of these regulations, State laws and other applicable County <br /> ordinances." The actual practice has been that the preliminary plat is circulated to the <br /> <br /> department of public works and department of water supply, who then give a general <br /> description of the standard of road and water system that must be installed. This is made <br /> <br /> a requirement of the tentative approval of the subdivision. The subdivider then prepares <br /> detailed construction plans which are reviewed before final approval. This is a more <br /> <br /> practical process, because the purpose of the preliminary plat is to determine the general <br /> layout of the subdivision, and detailed construction drawings depend upon the approval <br /> <br /> of the general layout. It does result in roads and water systems that meet the <br /> requirements. <br /> <br /> In addition, the Code calls for some information on the preliminary plat that the <br /> planning department has readily available, such as "zoning on and adjacent to the tract." <br /> <br /> In an effort to be user-friendly, the planning department will often accept preliminary <br /> plats for processing that do not have such information, rather than reject them for highly <br /> <br /> technical reasons. The Supreme Court decision, however, leaves no room for such <br /> practical considerations. <br /> <br /> The decision creates a dilemma in that there are several hundred subdivision <br /> applications pending at the planning department that do not conform to the strict letter of <br /> <br /> the Code in all respects. Most of the tentative and final subdivision approvals given by <br /> the department for several decades are based upon applications that have some defects <br /> <br /> according to the court decision. The department also continues to receive applications <br /> from surveyors and engineers who are submitting applications that would pass muster <br /> <br /> under the standards followed for many years but are technically deficient. <br /> The department cannot ignore the court's direction about how subdivision <br /> <br /> applications shall be processed, and the issuance of further approvals based on <br /> applications that do not fully conform is questionable. To require all pending subdivision <br /> <br /> applications to be re-submitted with all of the information listed in the subdivision code <br /> will cause a tremendous amount of unnecessary paperwork and duplication of effort by <br /> <br /> the County and by members of the public, not to mention the expense and delay that <br /> would accompany that process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.