Laserfiche WebLink
Communication 687 <br /> <br /> Bill 224 <br /> <br /> Page l0 of 12 <br /> have substantial benefit to a wide range of citizens of the west side. Mr. Giacometti believes that <br /> while community funding districts may work in specific instances in confined communities <br /> where confined communities are principal beneficiaries, this situation would be harder to define. <br /> However, he stated if there is appropriate districting, it may work. <br /> Committee Chair Pilago noted the DOE fair share amount is approximately $2,633,222.00 that <br /> will go into a designated account reserve for use in the existing school complex for Kealakehe. <br /> Mr. Giacometti stated the draft agreement was prepared by the Department of Education's <br /> facilities branch and noted that discussions with DOE have incorporated the provisions of this <br /> agreement. Mr. Giacometti stated he also envisions the development of a DOE facility on <br /> Palamanui land for use by the Department of Education. <br /> Council Member Jacobson confirmed that applicant would not be charging the University rent <br /> for the 20,000 square foot building it will construct on University land. Mr. Giacometti stated <br /> they are continuing to operate under the non-binding MOU for planning purposes and submitted <br /> in writing a binding offer by Hiluhilu to build the infrastructure and the 20,000 square foot <br /> facilities on university property and the of;=site infrastructure. The non-binding reference is only <br /> to the MOU. As for a timetable, he hopes to be in construction and have the facilities for the <br /> university open in the fall of 2008. He is also willing to build the mauka/makai road during the <br /> first increment of construction. As for Road 4, he has no timetable for that but Road 1 (up to <br /> Makalei Drive) would be an obligation that Hiluhilu would build first and complete within a year <br /> to 18 months. <br /> Council Chair Higa asked if applicant would be agreeable to a turn turn-key facility suitable to <br /> university standards and Mr. Giacometti stated they would provide a facility that the university <br /> could move their equipment into. Mr. Giacometti confirmed that applicant will build the same <br /> kind of facilities on the adjacent university property as it had planned to build on applicant's <br /> property. Guy Lam said they would build a facility mutually beneficial to both parties. Mr. Lam <br /> stated if the facility would be to service a student capacity of 3,000 there would be no problem <br /> with power, water and sewer and is certainly planning to work with the parties in putting a <br /> privatization plan together. Mr. Lam confirmed they have no problem with raising the park from <br /> 15 acres to 20 acres. Mr. Higa stated a grade separation on Queen Ka'ahumanu is needed <br /> somewhere and wants a commitment that this happens. Mr. Higa also stated he would have no <br /> problem in voting to allocate money for such a grade separation. Mr. Higa wants to be sure the <br /> University gets built and confirmed with the applicant that they are committed to providing the <br /> university with a space either on applicant's property or on the 500-acre parcel. Applicant is <br /> willing to do their part and suggests Chair Higa draft the language. <br /> Council Member Arakaki confirmed the facility on the university site would be built to county <br /> standards and whether applicant builds a facility on their property or on the university property, <br /> the facility size will be the same and up to county standards. Mr. Giacometti stated water <br /> availability could support the minimum facility size of 20,000 square feet but it's difficult to <br /> commit to a number limit on university occupancy. <br /> PC REPORT NO. 73 <br /> <br />