My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0939.002 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0939.002 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 2:06:52 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:01:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0939
Point
002
Author
Chris Yuen, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC - Presented - 7/18/06
Document Relationships
AGE PC 07/18/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
COM 0939.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
RES 383 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Honorable K. Angel Pilago, Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> County of Hawaii <br /> Committee on Planning <br /> Page 3 <br /> July 17, 2006 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> DHHL, which is believed to be consistent with the law regarding the County's land use <br /> authority (or lack thereof) over DHHL property. The MOA essentially allows the DHHL <br /> to choose the zoning of its property, without regard to the County General Plan. <br /> <br /> 4. Analysis. <br /> <br /> It is the Council's prerogative whether or not to initiate this General Plan amendment. <br /> I did want to briefly explain why I did not initiate a similar General Plan amendment to <br /> allow a resort at Honokohau, although this was requested by representatives of Jacoby <br /> Development, DLNR, and DHHL. <br /> <br /> The proposal would create about 2500 new visitor units. This is a massive project. <br /> Currently, there are about 4500 visitor units in North Kona, so this would be a major <br /> addition to the current inventory. <br /> <br /> This project, while a major development in itself, will generate a huge amount of <br /> additional development. The hotel and timeshare units, given typical staffing levels, will <br /> require from one half to one employee per unit. <br /> <br /> These employees cannot come from an existing pool of unemployed people seeking <br /> resort jobs in Kona, because there isn't one. West Hawaii resorts currently have more <br /> than 1000 vacant jobs that they have been unable to fill. <br /> The new workers for the Honokohau project will either have to commute into Kona from <br /> long distances, or we will need a huge increase in housing in Kona that these workers can <br /> afford. Clearly, long-distance commuting is not a viable strategy. The roads are already <br /> overcrowded, and commuters use the roads at the most congested times. Gas prices are <br /> high. Even if workers take the bus, spending hours each way to get to work is not a <br /> desirable lifestyle. These are the most important reasons that there are few employees to <br /> take existing jobs in West Hawaii resorts. <br /> <br /> The developer does propose to build some housing for its workforce on nearby State <br /> land. While this would be essential for the project, and a good thing, it does mean that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.