Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Communication 907 <br /> <br /> Bill 291 <br /> <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> Council Chair Higa noted that in Ms. Choquette's prior testimony today he recalled her <br /> stating that with the current zoning she is allowed to build another house, so the rezoning <br /> request by Mr. Shockley would not increase density, but would be the most desirable in <br /> her situation. <br /> Applicant's consultant, Greg Moores, stated that the application for rezoning is not being <br /> sought because of a divorce. He said Mr. Shockley's application is before the committee <br /> because the Council's own resolution authorizes and endorses this type of rezonings in <br /> the Kaloko Mauka Subdivision. He noted that the application is asking the council <br /> follow the provisions of the Resolution it previously adopted and that if these kinds of <br /> rezonings are in fact not the desire of the council, then the council should change it. <br /> Until then, it is his position applicant is entitled to such a rezoning request. <br /> Committee Chair Pilago stated he will be voting against this rezoning request for the <br /> reasons of watershed protection, preservation of the forest area and also because of <br /> ongoing problems with traffic. <br /> Your Committee on Planning concurs with the Planning Commission and the Planning Director's <br /> favorable recommendation for approval of the Change of Zone request. <br /> Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the intent and purpose of Bill 291 and <br /> recommends it pass first reading. <br /> and <br /> nras rvoes wa.e Ex Respectfully submitted, <br /> ARAKAHI X <br /> HIGA X COMMITTEE PLANNING <br /> HoFFtKANN x <br /> HOLSCHIJH X <br /> IKGDA X <br /> ISBELL x K. Angel Pilago, hair <br /> JACOB50N X <br /> PH.AGO X <br /> SAFARIIC X PC REPORT NO. 92 <br /> ADOPTED: J~~( <br /> O~nn~ <br /> <br />