My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0939.025 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0939.025 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 2:03:45 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:02:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0939
Point
025
Author
Christopher J. Yuen, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 8/1/06 Presented: Council - 8/1/06
Document Relationships
COM 0939.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
RES 383 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> JNfY Or ~4~ <br /> <br /> Harry Kim Christopher J. Yuen <br /> Mayor Director <br /> - - <br /> iT! O's •1~p-!~ <br /> Roy R. Takemoto <br /> Deputy Director <br /> (911unf of ('701tt£unit <br /> PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> 25 Aupuni street, Room 109 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4252 <br /> (808) 961-8288 • Fax (808) 961-8742 <br /> April 27, 2001 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Lincoln Ashida, Esq. <br /> Corporation Counsel <br /> Office of the Corporation Counsel <br /> 101 Aupuni Street <br /> Hilo, HI 96720 <br /> <br /> Dear Mr. Ashida: <br /> <br /> SUBJECT: PLAN INTERPRETATION <br /> <br /> The County Council has requested that Corporation Counsel issue an opinion about the <br /> scope of the Planning Director's discretion to make "map interpretations" that particular <br /> parcels are within specific categories on the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide <br /> (LUPAG) maps in the General Plan. This is in connection with a specific rezoning <br /> request-the property on the Panaewa corner of Puainako and Kanoelehua, across <br /> Puainako from Blockbuster, but it is something that is of great general significance. For <br /> that reason I wanted to share my thoughts before your office issued an opinion. <br /> <br /> The difficulty is that the LUPAG maps were, in most cases, only meant to show the <br /> general locations of particular uses. I have been told by Norman Hayashi, who worked <br /> on the original 1971 GP, that the maps were not meant to be precisely scaled. For <br /> example, the maps may show an industrial area that corresponds to an existing location, <br /> like a mill site, but if you were to try to scale the map location from fixed points, like a <br /> street intersection or the shoreline, you would not necessarily arrive at the actual existing <br /> location. The Planning Department simply did not try to make the maps have this kind of <br /> accuracy, in part because it did not intend that they be used with this degree of precision. <br /> The 1989 maps are on a scale of one-inch equals two miles, so a sixteenth of an inch is <br /> about 650 feet. This may be very significant in dealing with a particular property if one <br /> attempts to precisely scale off the map. <br /> In many cases, the designations are inherently imprecise. For example, there is often a <br /> 1 band of "Low Density" or "Urban Expansion" surrounding existing towns. This signifies <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.