Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The 2005 legislature passed Act 183, the "Important Agricultural Lands Bill," which amended <br /> Hawaii Revised Statutes Section 205-G in delineating the `county process' to be followed in <br /> identifying important agricultural lands. <br /> <br /> HRS, Section 205-G: Identification of Important Agricultural Lands: County Process. <br /> (a) Each County shall identify and map potential important agricultural lands within its <br /> jurisdiction based on standards and criteria in section 205-D and the intent of this part, <br /> except lands that have been designated through the State Land Use, Zoning, or county <br /> planning process, for Urban use by the County or State. <br /> Therefore, any effort to continue listing these lands as Important Agricultural Lands in the GP <br /> would be contrary to the clear intention of the legislature, which specifically excepted land <br /> within the SLU "Urban" district from being designated as Important Agricultural Lands for State <br /> Purposes. We believe that the GP designation should be consistent with the SLU classification <br /> and with State law as specifically outlined in the amendment of Hawaii Revised Statutes 205-G <br /> by Act 183 as described above. <br /> The historical use of this property has been ranching for the past 150 years with portions still <br /> used for cattle pasture, and no successful intensive agricultural activities (such as coffee) has <br /> ever taken place on the property in this historic period. The Land Study Bureau Overall Master <br /> Productivity rating classifies the soil of this land a "D" or "Poorly Suited", and "E" or "Very <br /> Poorly Suited" to agricultural productivity. <br /> <br /> In spite of the long time use as pasture, property taxes have been paid on the basis of its SLU <br /> "Urban" designation rather than at agricultural rates. This has resulted in hundreds of thousands <br /> of dollars in extra tax revenue to the County over the years. For the County to now deny it a <br /> designation consistent with the basis on which taxes have been paid and upon which the owners' <br /> expectations have come to rely would seem inequitable. <br /> T.M.K. 8-2-2-2 is in the process of being subdivided into 33 two acre lots pursuant to its present <br /> Residential Agricultural 2 acre zoning. These two acre lots will allow ample space for future lot <br /> holders to engage in the kind of rural lifestyle contemplated by such zoning and further described <br /> in the text General Plan for this proposed "Rural" land use designation. <br /> <br /> This subdivision is undertaken only after the completion of the most exacting archeological work <br /> by the project's archaeological consultants, International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc. <br /> The scope of this work was voluntarily and substantially expanded far beyond that which was <br /> required. A total of $250,378 has been spent to complete this work to the full and final <br /> satisfaction of the State Historic Preservation Division, and was undertaken in good faith based <br /> on the County's assurances that all the entitlements needed for this development were current and <br /> that the owner was in full compliance with the conditions of approval. We attach the final letters <br /> from the State Historic Preservation Division accepting the data recovery plan for the project and <br /> the preservation plan for four (4) sites that will be preserved within designated easements of the <br /> area being subdivided. The Hawai'i Island Burial Council has also given final approval to the <br /> burial treatment plan for the preservation-in-place of a single burial on the property. <br /> We anticipate and accept a requirement from the State Department of Health (DOH) that <br /> individual septic tanks will be required on each of the proposed two acre lots. In the remote event <br /> that the DOH would not insist upon such requirement, we would require it by a deed covenant, <br />