COM 1004.000 2004-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Steven S.C. Lim, Esq. Carlsmith Ball Page 3 July 14, 2003 6. Condition C of Ordinance 92-36 (as amended by Ordinance 95-118) required Consolidation approval of the subject properties (TMKs:7-5-01 0:portion of 013 and 7-5-023:063 & 067. This was complied with on October 28, 1992. In our letter dated September 15, 1992, we stated that `since the overall development is contingent upon the compliance of conditions of both Ordinance No. 92-36 and 90-10, especially with respect to the Consolidation condition of Ordinance No. 92-36, we shall use the effective date of Ordinance No. 92-36 to monitor the time conditions of both ordinances.' 7. Condition E of Ordinance 92-36 (as amended by Ordinance 95-118) stated that construction shall commence within five (5) years from the date of receipt of Final Plan approval and shall be completed within two years thereafter. In our letter dated December 16, 1997, an administrative time extension was granted until June 2, 2003 to commence construction and that construction shall be completed by June 2, 2005. According to your letter, construction activity has commenced. Please be informed that any additional extension of time beyond June 2, 2005 will require Planning Commission action. As noted above, the extension of time also applies to Ordinance 90-10 (REZ 524). 8. Condition N of Ordinance 92-36 (as amended by Ordinance 95-118) states that an annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date of this ordinance. The effective date of Ordinance 95-118 is October 12, 1995. Since we are using the effective date for Ordinance 95-118 for both ordinances (95-118 and 90-010), we will accept one annual progress report for both ordinances. The next annual progress report will be due on or before October 12, 2003.